I have mainly used shoutcast
haven't used jetcast or pirate radio
----- Original Message -----
From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>I will try but if it don't work with a screen reader then even I cant help
> from the other side of the atlantic I will post on thre forum for you you
> really need a static IP each time it changes it kills the stream. What are
> you used to jetcast by the also gets it on shoutcast. And can do icecast
> but
> I have never got that to work.
>
> mike
> amature call M0DMD
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of hank smith
> Sent: 12 July 2007 18:35
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>
> I don't have a static ip
> can you tell me how a totally blind person can set this program up?
> can you put the question on the forum?
> also can you tell me more how to use the jetcast thing as well?
> the methods mentioned here are way different then what I am used to doing.
> thanks
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:44 AM
> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>
>
>> It is simple to use but I guess you need sight Do you have a static I P
>> address if you have you only need to set it up once if you don't that
>> could
>> cause problems we use it but as I have sight in one eye I can set it up.
>> If
>> your screen does not read it that is a problem I will put a question on
>> the
>> forum for you. We also use shoutcast and jetcast. Simultaneous streaming.
>>
>> mike
>> amature call M0DMD
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of hank smith
>> Sent: 12 July 2007 09:32
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>
>> is the broadcasting software speech friendly?
>> I tried this a while back and nothing read
>> has this been changed?
>> if not friendly can you give some pointers on using this software with a
>> screen reader?
>> thanks
>> Hank
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>
>>
>>> http://www.pirateradio.com
>>>
>>> mike
>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of hank smith
>>> Sent: 11 July 2007 23:55
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>
>>> recommend any?
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>
>>>
>>>>I will say this I spent years on a ship in the north sea doing just that
>>>> this is no different there is a way round like find a server in Canada
>>>> for
>>>> instance
>>>>
>>>> mike
>>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>> On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
>>>> Sent: 11 July 2007 21:50
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>>
>>>> Do what you like: have an underground or private stream, have a public
>>>> stream and pay the extortion, have a public stream and be prepared to
>>>> pay the legal defense...whatever. All I'm saying is that it's naive to
>>>> just say, "Oh, well, screw 'em and do it anyway" if you don't
>>>> understand what the potential rammifications could be. And they could
>>>> be very expensive. It could be OK if your case is enough of a
>>>> precedent setter for someone like (for instance) the EFF to get behind
>>>> and back you with legal defense funding, but if not, then what are you
>>>> going to do? Think I like this state of affairs any better than you
>>>> do? Don't count on it. But it's at least one reason I generally don't
>>>> buy records put out by the major labels...sure, some I do if I like
>>>> them enough, but there are precious few of those anymore, and I'd
>>>> rather go out of my way to find good independent artists and support
>>>> them instead. Which brings up yet another option. Set up a stream with
>>>> free pod-safe music, or music you have permission to stream. You're
>>>> more likely to find this with independent artists and small,
>>>> independent labels. I expect that this would likely be the most
>>>> effective way to combat this: hit the RIAA where it counts: in the
>>>> wallet, by taking your business elsewhere. Sure, you'll have music
>>>> most people haven't heard of, but does that make it any less good or
>>>> valuable? I'd submit to you that in fact it's *more* valuable, because
>>>> it puts your money where it should be going in the first place, and
>>>> besides, it helps stick it to the greedy record labels as they're
>>>> assembled with the RIAA.
>>>> --
>>>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV
>>>> Email: [log in to unmask] or phone 888-75-BUDDY
>>>> Get a free online mall and earn on 1000 stores:
>>>> http://www.powermall.info
>>>> From Kitchen Disaster to Culinary Master, make meals and baking
>>>> easier and faster: http://www.tastyshop.net
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
