BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:42:12 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (141 lines)
I will try but if it don't work with a screen reader then even I cant help
from the other side of the atlantic I will post on thre forum for you you
really need a static IP each time it changes it kills the stream. What are
you used to jetcast by the also gets it on shoutcast. And can do icecast but
I have never got that to work.

mike
amature call M0DMD
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of hank smith
Sent: 12 July 2007 18:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL

I don't have a static ip
can you tell me how a totally blind person can set this program up?
can you put the question on the forum?
also can you tell me more how to use the jetcast thing as well?
the methods mentioned here are way different then what I am used to doing.
thanks

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL


> It is simple to use but I guess you need sight Do you have a static I P
> address if you have you only need to set it up once if you don't that 
> could
> cause problems we use it but as I have sight in one eye I can set it up. 
> If
> your screen does not read it that is a problem I will put a question on 
> the
> forum for you. We also use shoutcast and jetcast. Simultaneous streaming.
>
> mike
> amature call M0DMD
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of hank smith
> Sent: 12 July 2007 09:32
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>
> is the broadcasting software speech friendly?
> I tried this a while back and nothing read
> has this been changed?
> if not friendly can you give some pointers on using this software with a
> screen reader?
> thanks
> Hank
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:40 PM
> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>
>
>> http://www.pirateradio.com
>>
>> mike
>> amature call M0DMD
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators 
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of hank smith
>> Sent: 11 July 2007 23:55
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>
>> recommend any?
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>
>>
>>>I will say this I spent years on a ship in the north sea doing just that
>>> this is no different there is a way round like find a server in Canada
>>> for
>>> instance
>>>
>>> mike
>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
>>> Sent: 11 July 2007 21:50
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>
>>> Do what you like: have an underground or private stream, have a public
>>> stream and pay the extortion, have a public stream and be prepared to
>>> pay the legal defense...whatever. All I'm saying is that it's naive to
>>> just say, "Oh, well, screw 'em and do it anyway" if you don't
>>> understand what the potential rammifications could be. And they could
>>> be very expensive. It could be OK if your case is enough of a
>>> precedent setter for someone like (for instance) the EFF to get behind
>>> and back you with legal defense funding, but if not, then what are you
>>> going to do? Think I like this state of affairs any better than you
>>> do? Don't count on it. But it's at least one reason I generally don't
>>> buy records put out by the major labels...sure, some I do if I like
>>> them enough, but there are precious few of those anymore, and I'd
>>> rather go out of my way to find good independent artists and support
>>> them instead. Which brings up yet another option. Set up a stream with
>>> free pod-safe music, or music you have permission to stream. You're
>>> more likely to find this with independent artists and small,
>>> independent labels. I expect that this would likely be the most
>>> effective way to combat this: hit the RIAA where it counts: in the
>>> wallet, by taking your business elsewhere. Sure, you'll have music
>>> most people haven't heard of, but does that make it any less good or
>>> valuable? I'd submit to you that in fact it's *more* valuable, because
>>> it puts your money where it should be going in the first place, and
>>> besides, it helps stick it to the greedy record labels as they're
>>> assembled with the RIAA.
>>> -- 
>>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV
>>> Email: [log in to unmask] or phone 888-75-BUDDY
>>> Get a free online mall and earn on 1000 stores:
>>> http://www.powermall.info
>>> From Kitchen Disaster to Culinary Master, make meals and baking
>>> easier and faster: http://www.tastyshop.net
>>>
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2