BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:27:36 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (222 lines)
It is only a text file so it should be ok

mike
amature call M0DMD
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of matt V
Sent: 12 July 2007 19:50
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL

well this is why i don't use it, it was not speech friendly with windoweyes 
at all but then again i never tried jaws with it

msn: [log in to unmask]: aim: blindglass33, and skype matt.rushfan:
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "hank smith" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL


> do you know how speech friendly it is?
> thanks
> hank
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:41 AM
> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>
>
>>I have posted the question for you jetcast is a good free program it works
>> on shoutcast without having to use winamp or a separate playlist just set
>> up
>> preferences it is free with jet audio but the jetcast list is nasty
>>
>> mike
>> amature call M0DMD
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators 
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of hank smith
>> Sent: 12 July 2007 19:36
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>
>> I have mainly used shoutcast
>> haven't used jetcast or pirate radio
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:42 AM
>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>
>>
>>>I will try but if it don't work with a screen reader then even I cant 
>>>help
>>> from the other side of the atlantic I will post on thre forum for you 
>>> you
>>> really need a static IP each time it changes it kills the stream. What
>>> are
>>> you used to jetcast by the also gets it on shoutcast. And can do icecast
>>> but
>>> I have never got that to work.
>>>
>>> mike
>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> On Behalf Of hank smith
>>> Sent: 12 July 2007 18:35
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>
>>> I don't have a static ip
>>> can you tell me how a totally blind person can set this program up?
>>> can you put the question on the forum?
>>> also can you tell me more how to use the jetcast thing as well?
>>> the methods mentioned here are way different then what I am used to
>>> doing.
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:44 AM
>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>
>>>
>>>> It is simple to use but I guess you need sight Do you have a static I P
>>>> address if you have you only need to set it up once if you don't that
>>>> could
>>>> cause problems we use it but as I have sight in one eye I can set it 
>>>> up.
>>>> If
>>>> your screen does not read it that is a problem I will put a question on
>>>> the
>>>> forum for you. We also use shoutcast and jetcast. Simultaneous
>>>> streaming.
>>>>
>>>> mike
>>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>> On Behalf Of hank smith
>>>> Sent: 12 July 2007 09:32
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>>
>>>> is the broadcasting software speech friendly?
>>>> I tried this a while back and nothing read
>>>> has this been changed?
>>>> if not friendly can you give some pointers on using this software with 
>>>> a
>>>> screen reader?
>>>> thanks
>>>> Hank
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:40 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pirateradio.com
>>>>>
>>>>> mike
>>>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>> On Behalf Of hank smith
>>>>> Sent: 11 July 2007 23:55
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>>>
>>>>> recommend any?
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:43 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I will say this I spent years on a ship in the north sea doing just
>>>>>>that
>>>>>> this is no different there is a way round like find a server in 
>>>>>> Canada
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> instance
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mike
>>>>>> amature call M0DMD
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>> On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
>>>>>> Sent: 11 July 2007 21:50
>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do what you like: have an underground or private stream, have a 
>>>>>> public
>>>>>> stream and pay the extortion, have a public stream and be prepared to
>>>>>> pay the legal defense...whatever. All I'm saying is that it's naive 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> just say, "Oh, well, screw 'em and do it anyway" if you don't
>>>>>> understand what the potential rammifications could be. And they could
>>>>>> be very expensive. It could be OK if your case is enough of a
>>>>>> precedent setter for someone like (for instance) the EFF to get 
>>>>>> behind
>>>>>> and back you with legal defense funding, but if not, then what are 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> going to do? Think I like this state of affairs any better than you
>>>>>> do? Don't count on it. But it's at least one reason I generally don't
>>>>>> buy records put out by the major labels...sure, some I do if I like
>>>>>> them enough, but there are precious few of those anymore, and I'd
>>>>>> rather go out of my way to find good independent artists and support
>>>>>> them instead. Which brings up yet another option. Set up a stream 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> free pod-safe music, or music you have permission to stream. You're
>>>>>> more likely to find this with independent artists and small,
>>>>>> independent labels. I expect that this would likely be the most
>>>>>> effective way to combat this: hit the RIAA where it counts: in the
>>>>>> wallet, by taking your business elsewhere. Sure, you'll have music
>>>>>> most people haven't heard of, but does that make it any less good or
>>>>>> valuable? I'd submit to you that in fact it's *more* valuable, 
>>>>>> because
>>>>>> it puts your money where it should be going in the first place, and
>>>>>> besides, it helps stick it to the greedy record labels as they're
>>>>>> assembled with the RIAA.
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV
>>>>>> Email: [log in to unmask] or phone 888-75-BUDDY
>>>>>> Get a free online mall and earn on 1000 stores:
>>>>>> http://www.powermall.info
>>>>>> From Kitchen Disaster to Culinary Master, make meals and baking
>>>>>> easier and faster: http://www.tastyshop.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2