EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS is a forum for intelligent discussion of the optimal way of living described by Dr Arthur De Vany in his essay Evolutionary Fitness
There is a conference this week at the University of Southampton's Centre for the Foetal Origins of Adult Diseases.
The conference program is at:
http://www.foad2003.org/Programme.pdf
The BBC is reporting the conference. Here is their report on how foetal experiences can affect adult incomes (courageous to make that leap, but that's what happens when you let a journalist through the doors. At least the writer is quoted as saying that 'An unbalanced maternal diet can increase the mother's stress hormone levels' and this provides part of the link)
A few minutes ago I finished watching the first half-hour episode of the BBC's 'Walking with Cavemen'. It's a mixed bag; here are some of the positives:
1. excellent background to the causes of the climate change that transformed the African jungles into savanna and how this transformation enabled the evolutionary trajectory of Australopithecus to naturally select phenotypes that, eventually, became Homo sapiens sapiens. This part of the program made it abundantly clear how the many parallel branches of hominids arose
Nice to see phenotype being discussed. Seems all too often that phenotype is confused with genotype. That first lesson in genetics is such a yawn that the definitions get forgotten. Seems to me that variations in diet and exercise contribute more to variability of phenotype than do variations in genotype. I must be careful I might be burnt at stake for questioning the supremacy of the gene, it's a bit like questioning motherhood. We've had 50 years of Watson and Crick and nothing much to show for it*, just a big black hole for research dollars, maybe we should cut
>Did Winston cover iodine? Securing a source of >iodine is difficult even on a >Paleo diet (unless one eats the thyroid >gland- did the do that? I can't find >the iodine content of brain, does anyone >know if it's high). Iodine is very >pertinent to male and female infertility >but I've never known a fertility >consultant to check iodine status. > >Ben Balzer >
>This suggests >that people like Boyd Eaton won't be enough to >generate popular interest in evolutionary fitness >ideas (and as a result what I really want which is >large-scale epidemiological studies of the whole >approach), but rather it needs discussion by someone >who's publicly viewed as a `doctor'.
I found a great article supporting something Art Devany said years ago. He wrote that a "high energy flux" is key to health. Basically, high energy flux is both expending a large number of calories each day and consuming a large number of calories each day. The link to the article:
http://thefactsaboutfitness.com/research/age.htm
The article also talks about the decline in metabolism with age is apparently related to energy flux, not necessarily muscle mass.
Nice to know I'm not the only one that subscribes to Christian Finn's fine weekly newsblurb! Matt, are you a subscriber to Christian's paid stuff, or just the freebie(like me)?
Matt said: >I found a great article supporting something Art Devany said years ago. He >wrote that a "high energy flux" is key to health. Basically, high energy >flux is both expending a large number of calories each day and consuming a >large number of calories each day. The link to the article: > >http://thefactsaboutfitness.com/research/age.htm > >The article also talks about the decline in metabolism with age is >apparently related
On a lighter note, did anyone else get crushed by dalight savings time? I swear, it took me 4 or 5 days until I felt normal again. I bet the authors of "Lights Out" would have a filed day with this subject.
I think the point about motivation is a crucial one. Especially as people age, there is surely a decresed motivation for physical activity. Yet if you look at hunter-gatherer societies, you see people in their 70s that are still physically active for hours each day. If you just recommend to older people, "stay active", it's difficult to see how this will have any effect.
Something occurred to me while chasing a pair of ducks through the woods that had gotten loose. I sometimes do all-out 30 second sprints alternating with 30 second jogging, around five cycles. But chasing those ducks got me more out of breath than I've ever been while working out. Having that external goal for motivation seems to have made me push harder than I've been able to do when it's artificial exercise. Having more vital reasons for exerting may have been an advantage our pleistocene ancestors had over us in terms of acheiving a high degree of fitness. Hilary McClure
You'll see a couple of pictures of me at the gym at http://www.evfit.com/200206.htm and http://www.evfit.com/200207.htm and my son is at http://www.evfit.com/huw.htm
I'll get more up when we get the hang of the new camera, the scanner and FrontPage - a very un-Paleo set of hoops to have to go through to achieve one's aims!
Does anyone think that dancing tends to get overlooked as an imporant type of exercise? I have no research to back this up, but I often read about people in old age who are able to susatin their vigor through dancing. You don't her about a lot of 70-year olds who stay in shape by jogging. However, I do read about ballet dance, and some martial arts which could be thought of as slow dance, keeping older people in shape.
I found this link which has some generally good information but at the bottom of the page is some really great stuff. Enjoy! http://www.lef.org/news/nutrition/2003/03/13/DLPT/0000-7566-KEYWORD.Missing.html
My guess is it's more likely that they were going for the omega-3 fatty acids which are found at highest concentrations in organ meats, brain etc. Other hunters such as lions do the same thing. As well, skeletal muscle may be very lean and as such is avoided by hunter gatherers since the processing of so much protein to provide glycogen imposes a heavy load on the hunter gatherer's own liver.
>Didn't Art DeVany say something about how going without food for at >least an hour after a workout gives you the benefits of CRAN (or CRON) >without the lifelong hunger? Anyone know anything about that? I don't >remember what his reasoning was.
I think DeVany even recommended delaying water intake after a workout. If memory serves, I think he recommended no intake of food or water for 25+ minutes(45 mins optimal) after a workout.
Title A brief review of the archaeological evidence for Palaeolithic and Neolithic subsistence Source European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 56(12) Dec 2002 Author Richards MP.
[snipped] Abstract Knowledge of our ancestor's diets is becoming increasingly important in evolutionary medicine, as researchers have argued that we have evolved to specific type of 'Palaeolithic' diet, and many modern nutritional disorders relate to the mismatch between the diet to which we have evolved, and the newer agricultural-based 'Neolithic' diets. However, what is the archaeological evidence for pre-agricultural diets. This paper briefly introduces the three lines of evidence we have for Palaeolithic and Neolithic
I'm a little surprised at the discussion of human's desire for sweetness. I would have thought that fruit trees signal ripeness with signals which appeal to the senses of primates like us. It's peach season now where I live, and I can't help but notice colour changes, delicious scents and of course the gradual change from hard sour flesh to soft sweet flesh.
This is one of the few "good" things I have seen go through the very busy supertraining list. I have not looked back through the previous posts to see what prompted this response but it still strikes me that an evolutionary approach to health and fitness is unique and considered "fringe".
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:50:33 -0500 From: "James Krieger" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Evolution, endogenous retrovirus, and pseudogenes
Though there isn't much about exercise, I found "Human Diet: Its Origin and Evolution" (2002) edited by Peter S. Ungar and Mark F. Teaford to be a very good read. It gives many perspectives on the Paleo diet and its role in fighting modern health problems. A summary is at amazon.com.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:56, sean mcbride <[log in to unmask]> wrote on the subject of sweetness:
> I don't know if you are familiar with Aboriginal > wild foods but not too many of them are sweet > as we are used to. I think we developed a taste > for sweetness due to the lack of sweet things > in the environment.
I don't know if you are familiar with Aboriginal wild foods but not too many of them are sweet as we are used to. I think we develloped a taste for sweetness due to the lack of sweet things in the environment. Occasionally there were very sweet things eg bush honey but on the whole not many. Also it seems rare to find large sweet fruits (I'm talking about Australia here) although there are a few small sweet ones eg native cherry. The pigmy have a lower sensitivity to sugar compared to surrounding populations outside the rainforest. When
>I don't think that being attracted to sweetness would be explained by a lack of sweet foods, unless sweetness was associated with some physiological or survival benefit. Aboriginals would, I guess, out of habit, have generally associated energy replenishment with their animal >food intake.
I think you are absolutely right and this was what I should have been more clear about in my post. Sweetness is usually (not alwys) an indicator of useful energy and hence its prevalence IMHO.
Ming wrote on Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:34 AM > >My personal experience eating paleo and Atkins type diets >was one of misery .... The NHE made me feel lousy too. >... It's only when I allowed rice and some other carbs back >into the diet that I feel good again. > >My question to the people here is, how much variation >can we expect ... between people? And how much >does genetic imprinting based on one's early >diet affect one's metabolism later in life? > >Just because some Inuits lived off whale >meat and caribou doesn't mean everyone else
>R U saying that the insulin could rise after the four-hour period?
I think it's possible. Why not? I guess it depends on whether you believe that fat can cause a rise in insulin levels. I recall at least one study that says it can. Utilization of blood lipids is at least partially controlled by insulin levels.
Well at least I'm not the only one with this experience! I do think there is more to the carbohydrate issue, though I don't have all the answers. I have been reading some very interesting older posts by Jeannie Brand-Miller over on the PaleoDiet symposium. She seems to push for higher carbs, and even sugary carbs.
My personal experience eating paleo and Atkins type diets was one of misery. For over a year, I restricted severely my non-fruit and non-vegetable carb intake for a year and suffered easy fatigue, difficulty sleeping and low body mass.
It's only when I allowed rice and some other carbs back into the diet that I feel good again.
Robb, Rick, Bob and Robert all make points I agree with. I would just add that Rob Faigin focuses on the neuroendocrine responses to different exercise types (even specific exercises), recovery and different maconutrient intakes. Faigin's recommendations concerning carbs need to be read in the light of his efforts to enhance the beneficial hormonal response for the best of health; this means he distinguishes between fructose and glucose and between carbs from starch, carbs from vegetables and carbs from fruit - broadly speaking. His recommendations for occasional carb loading should be seen as recommendations to maximize the many beneficial effects
Thanks for your comments. I am skeptical about the fat-burner/sugar-burner dichotomy. It just sounds a bit too unscientific for me. Sure, the body can run on different types of fuel, but I doubt it's a black-and-white issue. Faigan never really talks about a dividing line between the two, or why it takes 7 days to "switch-over". I would also hypthosize that their are genetic differences as to carbohydrate preferences, though I don't have any cites for this.
I wanted to make a few points. First, I have read Lights Out and cited it in my book. Second, I also emphasize variety in my training, and emphasize it in my book as well.
It also seems like you are contradicting yourself. You claim carbohydrates aren't needed for energy, yet the NHE cycles carbs in. If they aren't necessary, why not go lower-carb all the time? My idea is that a certain level of carbohydrate intake is needed for energy in the modern world. Whether you get that through a higher daily intake of carbs, or by carb-
I see where there are a few posts regarding post-workout meals and DeVany's take on this. This leads me to an important point I would like to make.
Is it possible we are all taking Devany's suggestions too seriously? In other words, even though Art appears to have some good ideas, where's the corresponding research? I have not seen Art citing any empirical studies to support his hypotheses. I made sure to list all the necessary citations in my book, and Loren Cordain lists a ton of research in his. So far, it seems Art has mentioned very few, if
Good points in this e-mail Matt. I was looking at longevity amongst bodybuilders earlier this year and there certainly seem to be many from the 1930's, 40's and 50's (even 1920's) who are still around and still in great shape. John Grimek died recently in his 80's and in good shape. These guys were mainly pre-supplement era and into milk and meat etc for the most part but I would guess their diets varied a lot. Bodybuilding was perhaps the common thread. Use it or lose it.
Matt Metzgar wrote: [snip] >You claim carbohydrates aren't needed for energy, yet the NHE cycles carbs in. If they aren't >necessary, why not go lower-carb all the time? My idea is that a certain level of carbohydrate intake is needed for energy >in the modern world. Whether you get that through a higher daily intake of carbs, or by carb-loading every few days (NHE), >may not be important. What I am saying is that some minimum level of carbohydrates seems necessary for optimal functioning, >and that level can be difficult to obtain through Paleo eating (primarily due to the large
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:16:20 -0500 From: Matt Metzgar <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: NHE
>>Keith,
>>Thanks for your comments. I am skeptical about >>the fat-burner/sugar-burner dichotomy. It >>just sounds a bit too unscientific for me. >>Sure, the body can run on different types >>of fuel, but I doubt it's a black-and-white >>issue. >> <snip> >>I think modern people may have more of >>a year-round need for carbohydrates (for >>energy) due to the increased hours of >>activity.
Robert Wolf wrote: > Keith-Thank you for your on going discussion of NHE. It has been very > effective for me as well. I am curious what the lists experience has been > with regards to post work out nutrition specifically ingesting carbs post > workout. Art and Rob Faigan argue against it but John berardi (and > seemingly everyone else around!) argue for protein/carbs post work out. I > have noticed when I did this I simply did not feel good. A post work out > meal of protein and fat predominantly left me feeling great...not so the >
In it he references a number of links to recent research and books that help explain why power law distributions exist. If, like me, you maintain a list EV-ish bookmarks, this essay will have you adding several entries to your Favorites.
Dave, Regarding HMP and Glutathione, here's a couple of old posts of Art's from the archives:
Around 2000 "Drs. Seligman and Demopolous hold patents for glutathione delivery that solves the problem of breakdown in the gut. I don't know any of the details. But, they are scientists and have tested serum glutathione levels with their delivery system and the results do show elevated levels.
"Performance" Packs is again quite ambiguous. After taking a closer look last night at the materials available on the HMPScience website I now believe that Art is probably using the Ultrathione 1000 product.
DF
>I am never sick and never tired and some of that credit goes to the >Glutathione Performance Packs. I healed from RK surgery about 15 years
Just living, breathing & drinking water will put a huge amount of toxins in your body. A recent study by Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, in collaboration with the Environmental Working Group and Commonweal, found an average of 91 industrial compounds, pollutants, and other chemicals in the blood and urine of nine volunteers, with a total of 167 chemicals found in the group. The people tested do not work with chemicals on the job and do not live near an industrial facility.
My apologies for the sloppy English in my previous post. I was off to a 7:00am start for rowing training, so I threw my response together a bit too hastily.
This brings me to the point of this second post: maintaining energy levels on a low-carb diet. I mentioned that I had no problems in this respect. Let me give you now a couple of examples.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:58:41 -0500 From: Matt Metzgar <[log in to unmask]> Subject: NHE carb-loading
> A question: In Faigan's NHE, carb-loading takes place > every 3 or 4 days. I am interested in trying this, > but I would like a better theoretical base. > Would this type of situation have happened > in the Paleo world? In other words, > would HGs have somehow naturally carb-loaded > every few days?
A question: In Faigan's NHE, carb-loading takes place every 3 or 4 days. I am interested in trying this, but I would like a better theoretical base. Would this type of situation have happened in the Paleo world? In other words, would HGs have somehow naturally carb-loaded every few days?
My only idea is that when they were not successful on the hunt (and therefore had little protein and fat to consume), they would eat mainly frutis, vegetables, nuts, & berries, and therefore "carb-load" in a sense.
Can I toss this idea in for comment? I'd be really interested in your views.
Where people write about Evolutionary Fitness or the Paleo lifestyle (usually diet) and our human ancestors, they often refer to eras or date ranges to indicate a benchmark 'Golden Age' which epitomizes most fully the distinguishing features they want to emphasize.
I did note that the word "book" was mentioned in your intro as well as by the good Dr himself late in the interview. Did you get any sense as to when this tome would be finished? I just had to ask.
A good journalists overview of the complex causes of present epidemic of obesity, the commercial interests of the fast food industry - and the muck put they in mass food in the interests of the processors rather than the consumers, a reference to hunter-gatherer food (sadly wrong), the need for more exercise, is to be found at:
Do you know of any posters or 2003 wall calendars, suitable for display in my office, which exemplify human evolution? I don't want anything too subtle (such as a mother and child painting which depicts human bonding, nurturing etc) as I want to use the display to stimulate interest and discussion. There is the evolvefish.com product range, including their 2003 calendar - but I don't want to have my nose punched in:
Back on 21 August 2002 I alerted you to the then-recent film Atanarjuat. I saw it a month ago and here are some observations. I dont go to the cinema often enough to call the following a review and, in any case, I focus here on what I see as most relevant to Evolutionary Fitness and plenty was!
For someone who purports not to be offering a film review, you do an excellent job of intriguing this reader's interest. I had forgotten all about the film, but now have made a note to see it.
> one woman spends some time explaining > how her mother was also her grandmother as a result of marriages.
Thanks for the review! I agree with much of what you said. I don't know whether you have read many of the books on Dan Quinn's recommended book list, but there are several that are worthwhile regarding the life of hunter-gatherers. These include "Limited Wants, Unlimited Means" edited by John Gowdy, "Stone Age Economics" by Marshall Sahlins, and "Mans Rise to Civilization..." by Peter Farb. Regarding the Inuit, I recommend "Kabloona" by Poncins and "The Other Side of Eden" by Hugh Brody. In addition, there are many anthropology films about hunter-gatherers that can be accessed through local or university
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before, but Loren Cordain has put up a website to supplement his book. It contains research papers that can be downloaded:
The New Scientist website, www.newscientist.com, tells us that the US edition of that magazine has been available weekly since October 2002. This high quality, critical news magazine gives prominence to discoveries and insights in human evolution, human health, diet and complexity. It rarely covers exercise, but for our purposes makes up by publishing a lot of material which is _implicitly_ rather than _explicitly_ stimulating and informative to the Evolutionary Fitness thinker.
The FAQ for this list has been up-dated and is available on line at http://www.evfit.com/faq.htm
This FAQ is a living, breathing document. If you would like to add to it or suggest enhancements (bearing in mind the need to keep the overall FAQ down to a manageable size), please e-mail me at [log in to unmask]
My apologies for the period of some months during which the FAQ was not available on line.
Here's kind of a nifty nutrient calculator. Click on any header to re-sort the data from least to most for whatever nutrient you're interested n. --But several non-paleo foods are here, too.
Am I wrong or doesn't the *ash* content of a food (as per the USDA Nutrient Database) reflect pH? Maybe I'm confusing this with something else.
Keith, there's still hope for your wife. :-) If I hadn't done the Eades' Protein Power with good success over 2 yrs ago, I may never have found and gone Paleo. It was a logical progression for me. It was only after I went Paleo that I got a copy of the Eades' LifePlan book. Their most stringent level adheres pretty well to Paleo. Since she likes the Eades' diet and wants to stick
I have been off and on the paleodiet for 4 years now. I have gotten to the point where I prefer to eat a huge amount of food (3+ lbs of meat, salad or greens, and some fruit) at one sitting (usually lunch) and have no appetite otherwise. When I am really hungry (usually at lunchtime), it is as you described very different from the 'hormonal hunger' that I experience on a higher carb diet.
One midday meal per day may be good a good thing from the point of view of growth hormone release, especially during the night. However, one also may want to consider the very large insulin hit that comes with high calorie meals (even with adequate amounts of fat). On balance, it may be healthier to eat two (or even three) smaller, (lower calorie) meals during the day with no consumption in the hours before sleep. This also provides a more even supply of nutrients. Occasional changes in this routine can be included to generate some randomness
To my surprise, I have been able to lose weight more rapidly by eating essentially once per day (I have about 50 lbs to lose) despite eating more calories than normal. I also sleep better and function better mentally.
The change occurred when I realized about a month ago that I was eating according to the clock albeit small meals rather than according to hunger signals. Once I decided to eat only when hungry I naturally started eating only once per day. That said...I do eat more frequently if I am hungry.
Lucky you! Ever since I got to my 'healthy weight' (the weight where I do not get periodically sick), I have tried to follow the 'only eat when you are hungry'. Problem is, I can go long periods of time without feeling hunger 12h-18h (and more) but I force myself to eat before that. If I do not, I get all sorts of skin infections (bumps, rashes, and buttons that take 2 weeks to get away). Also, when one of these 'phases' comes up, I crave and eat more carbs. I guess I am a closet diabetic or I have
In a message dated 12/21/2002 5:11:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
> I would like to add to my spreadsheet (which calculates for me the > macronutrient ratios for ingredients, meals or a day’s or month’s intake) > some algorithm to come up with a pH measure. Do you have some data or > formulae which would help me do this? How would I do this? Perhaps it > would be very rough as I imagine you’d be looking at some sort of rolling > average over the time that a particular meal was exerting its influence on >
In a message dated 12/22/2002 3:59:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
> No, Bob. As mentioned above, I am interested in the pH balance in the > kidneys, not in the food intake and not in the blood stream. These may be > good proxies of the kidney load. What do you reckon? Is there any good > science to back it up the use of such proxies? Loren Cordain's book has an > outline which explains why this is important. >
From: Bob Fritz <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Net alkalinizing diet
In a message dated 12/21/2002 5:11:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
>> I would like to add to my spreadsheet (which calculates for me the >> macronutrient ratios for single ingredients, meals or intake for >> a day or a month) some algorithm to come up with a pH measure. >> Do you have some data or formulae which would help me do this? >> How would I do this? Perhaps it would be very rough >> as I imagine you would be looking at some sort of >> rolling
Lots to comment upon here and so many questions to ask!
1. Acid/alkaline - for Robb
Robb says:
> if I do not add huge quantities > of olive oil to most meals it is > fairly easy for me to reach > a net alkaline state
What do you mean by huge? I add about 30ml to a salad and regard that as moderate. 60ml I would regard as large and anything over 100ml as huge for a single meal. Are we on the same wavelength?
From: "Robert Wolf" Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:10 AM Subject: Net alkalinizing diet
>I put this question to the list a few days ago amidst >another message and received no responses so I am >going to try again! On the topic of acid/base >balance and eating a net alkalinizing diet as Loren >Cordain recommends, what are your thoughts? >For me fruit seems to be a more dense and easily >accessible source for an alkaline load but I digestively >do not tolerate fruit well and immediately experience >what I would describe as "carb head". >I am curious if others have any
A guide to healthy eating and exercising.This is a good book as a primer for those who have a non scientific back ground.It explains the principles behind paleo nutrition and exercise in terms that are easy to follow and therefore commence the programme.It has a different format from the usual books with the principles on one page and the key memorable phrases on the facing page.This is a work-book as one reads further you can enter information onto this work page creating your own work book record.
The paleolithic diet may have a variable amount of meat and plant depending on the natural resources available eg inuit 90% animal/fish.Is there any information about how a group that has been genetically eating one form of paleo diet but then transfers to another paleo diet.This is not the same as a ethnic group eating a modern diet.I would suggest that it may have a deleterious effect changing from a high animal hunter- gathering diet to a high plant hunter-gathering diet over ashort period of time -----Original Message----- From: Evolutionary Fitness Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Automatic digest processor Sent:
>Is there any information about how a group >that has been genetically eating one form of >paleo diet but then transfers to another >paleo diet.This is not the same as a ethnic group eating a modern diet. >I would suggest that it may have a >deleterious effect changing from a >high animal hunter- gathering diet to a >high plant hunter-gathering diet over >a short period of time.
About 70 years ago, Weston Price found evidence that US soils were depleted. Writing about phosphorous, which is essential for mammalian health, he said Now when we realize that a 60 bushel crop per acre of wheat or corn will remove from the soil about 25 pounds of phosphorous per acre, or one fortieth of the total content in the top 7 inches, we are immediately confronted with the fundamental, controlling problem that we have, accordingly, only enough phosphorous in the average soil for forty excellent crops ... The idea has been picked up by other writers (e.g., Empty Harvest)
This is a bugbear, I think. If you look at the long range CO2 levels in the atmosphere, the current levels are near the bottom of the chart. Modern plants evolved in an atmosphere with far higher CO2 than the present. Some scientists believe we very nearly had a global crash during the last ice age, because CO2 levels fell nearly to the point that green plants could not survive at all. Plants in the modern atmosphere are stressed by too low CO2, not too much. Our ancestors evolved to eat those plants as they developed in high CO2 atmospheres,