EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS Archives

Evolutionary Fitness Discussion List

EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS is a forum for intelligent discussion of the optimal way of living described by Dr Arthur De Vany in his essay Evolutionary Fitness

Options: Use Classic View
Show Table of Contents

Keith Thomas
Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:17:01 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Sun, 9 Aug 2009 16:13:30 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:11:00 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Barry Blesser
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:08:39 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
<>
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:14:37 EDT
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Ev Convert
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:50:18 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:07:09 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 4 Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:45:04 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Tim Rowell
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:26:34 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Boulin Rick
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:15:29 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
<>
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:28 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:52:23 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 4 Replies
Keith Thomas
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:26:31 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:28:58 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Wally Day
Mon, 16 May 2005 00:36:09 -0600
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Andy Garza
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:39:34 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:11:58 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 05:48:53 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
<>
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:43:41 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:29:10 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:22:07 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Chris Highcock
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:09:09 -0000
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Petr Ruzicka
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:08:36 +0100
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Robb Wolf
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:36:47 -0800
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Iain Townsend
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:46:37 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Iain Townsend
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:43:30 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Robb Wolf
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:17:23 -0800
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Balzer, Ben
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:49:11 +1100
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Robert Wolf
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:58:47 -0800
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Ann Blachly
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:20:49 -0800
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Wiley Long
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:39:56 -0700
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Wally Day
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 01:04:13 -0700
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Wally Day
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:53:52 -0700
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Tim Rowell
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:56:30 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 06:13:13 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:22:29 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 04:14:01 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:36:02 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 4 Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:06:31 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Daniel Chong
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:52:38 -0800
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:01:52 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:49:15 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:36:26 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:53:54 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Fred Welfare
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:54:33 EST
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:05:33 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 3 Replies
Craig Miles
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:12:23 +1100
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:15:50 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Robert Wolf
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:59:26 -0700
Reply
No abstract is available available for this message. [Read Message ...]
Reply
Show Replies 4 Replies
Robert Wolf
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:44:45 -0700
Reply
No abstract is available available for this message. [Read Message ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:07:01 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 3 Replies
Robert Wolf
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:40:32 -0700
Reply
No abstract is available available for this message. [Read Message ...]
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Persephone
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:57:04 +0100
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Tim Rowell
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:09:11 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:17:05 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 3 Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:19:51 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:22:26 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 06:03:44 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
KF
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:28:11 -0400
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:18:24 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:09:30 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:58:03 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 06:36:32 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)
Sat, 17 Jul 2004 04:43:42 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
John Cogburn
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:45:42 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 4 Replies
Wally Day
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 15:00:12 -0600
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Robert Wolf
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:49:25 -0700
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 08:17:55 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:23:55 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
John Cogburn
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:44:28 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 04:33:00 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 02:43:55 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 04:30:51 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
John Brumby
Fri, 14 May 2004 07:56:00 +0100
Reply
Looking forward for a response :P

20446 -- archive password
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 06:44:28 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
John Cogburn
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:00:14 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
John Cogburn
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:59:05 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
John Cogburn
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:35:09 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
John Cogburn
Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:22:36 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Tim Rowell
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:28:38 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:58:58 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:20:44 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:10:00 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Tom Bridgeland
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:27:14 +0900
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 3 Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 9 Aug 2003 02:22:15 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Balzer, Ben
Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:16:14 +1000
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Tue, 5 Aug 2003 07:59:55 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Balzer, Ben
Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:35:17 +1000
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Sat, 2 Aug 2003 04:59:31 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 4 Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:31:39 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 03:49:21 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Tom Bridgeland
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 07:19:17 +0900
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:00:47 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Iain Townsend
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:28:58 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:44:02 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:50:26 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:30:12 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
Show Replies 4 Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 08:06:43 -0500
Reply
To reply to a digest, insert the relevant message header; don't reply to the digest header
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 18:22:57 -0500
Reply
There is a conference this week at the University of Southampton's Centre
for the Foetal Origins of Adult Diseases.

The conference program is at:

http://www.foad2003.org/Programme.pdf

The BBC is reporting the conference. Here is their report on how foetal
experiences can affect adult incomes (courageous to make that leap, but
that's what happens when you let a journalist through the doors. At least
the writer is quoted as saying that 'An unbalanced maternal diet can
increase the mother's stress hormone levels' and this provides part of the
link)

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:30:59 -0500
Reply
A few minutes ago I finished watching the first half-hour episode of the
BBC's 'Walking with Cavemen'. It's a mixed bag; here are some of the
positives:

1. excellent background to the causes of the climate change that
transformed the African jungles into savanna and how this transformation
enabled the evolutionary trajectory of Australopithecus to naturally
select phenotypes that, eventually, became Homo sapiens sapiens. This
part of the program made it abundantly clear how the many parallel
branches of hominids arose

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 3 Replies
Matt Metzgar
Mon, 5 May 2003 14:04:28 -0500
Reply
I found a great article supporting something Art Devany said years ago. He
wrote that a "high energy flux" is key to health. Basically, high energy
flux is both expending a large number of calories each day and consuming a
large number of calories each day. The link to the article:

http://thefactsaboutfitness.com/research/age.htm

The article also talks about the decline in metabolism with age is
apparently related to energy flux, not necessarily muscle mass.
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Matt Metzgar
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:34:10 -0500
Reply
On a lighter note, did anyone else get crushed by dalight savings time? I
swear, it took me 4 or 5 days until I felt normal again. I bet the authors
of "Lights Out" would have a filed day with this subject.
Reply
No Replies
Matt Metzgar
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:17:18 -0500
Reply
I think the point about motivation is a crucial one. Especially as people
age, there is surely a decresed motivation for physical activity. Yet if
you look at hunter-gatherer societies, you see people in their 70s that are
still physically active for hours each day. If you just recommend to
older people, "stay active", it's difficult to see how this will have any
effect.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Hilary McClure
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 07:39:46 -0400
Reply
Something occurred to me while chasing a pair of ducks through the woods
that had gotten loose. I sometimes do all-out 30 second sprints
alternating with 30 second jogging, around five cycles. But chasing
those ducks got me more out of breath than I've ever been while working
out. Having that external goal for motivation seems to have made me push
harder than I've been able to do when it's artificial exercise. Having
more vital reasons for exerting may have been an advantage our
pleistocene ancestors had over us in terms of acheiving a high degree of
fitness.
Hilary McClure


[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Sat, 5 Apr 2003 16:30:47 -0500
Reply
You'll see a couple of pictures of me at the gym at
http://www.evfit.com/200206.htm and http://www.evfit.com/200207.htm and my
son is at http://www.evfit.com/huw.htm

I'll get more up when we get the hang of the new camera, the scanner and
FrontPage - a very un-Paleo set of hoops to have to go through to achieve
one's aims!

Keith
Reply
No Replies
Matt Metzgar
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:30:48 -0500
Reply
Does anyone think that dancing tends to get overlooked as an imporant type
of exercise? I have no research to back this up, but I often read about
people in old age who are able to susatin their vigor through dancing. You
don't her about a lot of 70-year olds who stay in shape by jogging.
However, I do read about ballet dance, and some martial arts which could be
thought of as slow dance, keeping older people in shape.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Robert Wolf
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:32:37 +0000
Reply
I found this link which has some generally good information but at the
bottom of the page is some really great stuff.
Enjoy!
http://www.lef.org/news/nutrition/2003/03/13/DLPT/0000-7566-KEYWORD.Missing.html
Reply
No Replies
Iain Townsend
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:34:54 -0500
Reply
My guess is it's more likely that they were going for the omega-3 fatty
acids which are found at highest concentrations in organ meats, brain etc.
Other hunters such as lions do the same thing. As well, skeletal muscle may
be very lean and as such is avoided by hunter gatherers since the
processing of so much protein to provide glycogen imposes a heavy load on
the hunter gatherer's own liver.
Reply
No Replies
Matt Metzgar
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:37:05 -0500
Reply
In regards to last month's post about the subject, I thought this was
interesting:

"Consumption of "snacks" would occur throughout the day, with hunters often
removing the liver from a "kill", and eating it on the spot, often raw."

I'm not exactly sure what is in animal liver, but I'm guessing there is
glycogen.

Mann, Neil (2000): Dietary lean red meat and human evolution. European
Journal of Nutrition, 39, pg. 73.
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Keith Thomas
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 05:57:35 -0500
Reply
Title
A brief review of the archaeological evidence for Palaeolithic and
Neolithic subsistence
Source
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 56(12) Dec 2002
Author
Richards MP.

[snipped] Abstract
Knowledge of our ancestor's diets is becoming increasingly important in
evolutionary medicine, as researchers have argued that we have evolved to
specific type of 'Palaeolithic' diet, and many modern nutritional disorders
relate to the mismatch between the diet to which we have evolved, and the
newer agricultural-based 'Neolithic' diets.
However, what is the archaeological evidence for pre-agricultural diets.
This paper briefly introduces the three lines of evidence we have for
Palaeolithic and Neolithic

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Iain Townsend
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:33:18 -0500
Reply
I'm a little surprised at the discussion of human's desire for sweetness.
I would have thought that fruit trees signal ripeness with signals which
appeal to the senses of primates like us. It's peach season now where I
live, and I can't help but notice colour changes, delicious scents and of
course the gradual change from hard sour flesh to soft sweet flesh.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Robert Wolf
Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:27:01 -0500
Reply
This is one of the few "good" things I have seen go through the very busy
supertraining list. I have not looked back through the previous posts to
see what prompted this response but it still strikes me that an evolutionary
approach to health and fitness is unique and considered "fringe".

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:50:33 -0500
From: "James Krieger" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Evolution, endogenous retrovirus, and pseudogenes

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Matt Metzgar
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:42:45 -0500
Reply
Though there isn't much about exercise, I found "Human Diet: Its Origin and
Evolution" (2002) edited by Peter S. Ungar and Mark F. Teaford to be a very
good read. It gives many perspectives on the Paleo diet and its role in
fighting modern health problems. A summary is at amazon.com.
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:42:17 -0500
Reply
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:56,
sean mcbride <[log in to unmask]>
wrote on the subject of sweetness:

> I don't know if you are familiar with Aboriginal
> wild foods but not too many of them are sweet
> as we are used to. I think we developed a taste
> for sweetness due to the lack of sweet things
> in the environment.

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:23:34 -0500
Reply
Ming wrote on Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:34 AM
>
>My personal experience eating paleo and Atkins type diets
>was one of misery .... The NHE made me feel lousy too.
>... It's only when I allowed rice and some other carbs back
>into the diet that I feel good again.
>
>My question to the people here is, how much variation
>can we expect ... between people? And how much
>does genetic imprinting based on one's early
>diet affect one's metabolism later in life?
>
>Just because some Inuits lived off whale
>meat and caribou doesn't mean everyone else

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
minger
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:34:03 -0500
Reply
My personal experience eating paleo and Atkins type diets was one of misery.
For over a year, I restricted severely my non-fruit and non-vegetable carb
intake for a year and suffered easy fatigue, difficulty sleeping and low
body mass.

It's only when I allowed rice and some other carbs back into the diet that I
feel good again.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:32:24 -0500
Reply
Robb, Rick, Bob and Robert all make points I agree with. I would just add
that Rob Faigin focuses on the neuroendocrine responses to different
exercise types (even specific exercises), recovery and different
maconutrient intakes. Faigin's recommendations concerning carbs need to
be read in the light of his efforts to enhance the beneficial hormonal
response for the best of health; this means he distinguishes between
fructose and glucose and between carbs from starch, carbs from vegetables
and carbs from fruit - broadly speaking. His recommendations for
occasional carb loading should be seen as recommendations to maximize the
many beneficial effects

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Matt Metzgar
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:10:28 -0500
Reply
I see where there are a few posts regarding post-workout meals and DeVany's
take on this. This leads me to an important point I would like to make.

Is it possible we are all taking Devany's suggestions too seriously? In
other words, even though Art appears to have some good ideas, where's the
corresponding research? I have not seen Art citing any empirical studies
to support his hypotheses. I made sure to list all the necessary citations
in my book, and Loren Cordain lists a ton of research in his. So far, it
seems Art has mentioned very few, if

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Krikorian, Robert (KRIKORR)
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:22:15 -0500
Reply
Matt Metzgar wrote:
[snip]
>You claim carbohydrates aren't needed for energy, yet the NHE cycles carbs
in. If they aren't
>necessary, why not go lower-carb all the time? My idea is that a certain
level of carbohydrate intake is needed for energy >in the modern world.
Whether you get that through a higher daily intake of carbs, or by
carb-loading every few days (NHE), >may not be important. What I am saying
is that some minimum level of carbohydrates seems necessary for optimal
functioning, >and that level can be difficult to obtain through Paleo eating
(primarily due to the large

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 04:46:55 -0500
Reply
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:16:20 -0500
From: Matt Metzgar <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: NHE

>>Keith,

>>Thanks for your comments. I am skeptical about
>>the fat-burner/sugar-burner dichotomy. It
>>just sounds a bit too unscientific for me.
>>Sure, the body can run on different types
>>of fuel, but I doubt it's a black-and-white
>>issue.
>>
<snip>
>>I think modern people may have more of
>>a year-round need for carbohydrates (for
>>energy) due to the increased hours of
>>activity.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Hilary McClure
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:27:28 -0500
Reply
Robert Wolf wrote:
> Keith-Thank you for your on going discussion of NHE. It has been very
> effective for me as well. I am curious what the lists experience has been
> with regards to post work out nutrition specifically ingesting carbs post
> workout. Art and Rob Faigan argue against it but John berardi (and
> seemingly everyone else around!) argue for protein/carbs post work out. I
> have noticed when I did this I simply did not feel good. A post work out
> meal of protein and fat predominantly left me feeling great...not so the
>

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Dave Fobare
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:58:00 -0600
Reply
One of my favorite bloggers, Clay Shirky, just produced a short essay on
power law distributions and weblogs:

http://www.shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html

In it he references a number of links to recent research and books that
help explain why power law distributions exist. If, like me, you maintain a
list EV-ish bookmarks, this essay will have you adding several entries to
your Favorites.

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:06:30 -0500
Reply
Just living, breathing & drinking water will put a huge amount of toxins
in your body. A recent study by Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New
York, in collaboration with the Environmental Working Group and
Commonweal, found an average of 91 industrial compounds, pollutants, and
other chemicals in the blood and urine of nine volunteers, with a total of
167 chemicals found in the group. The people tested do not work with
chemicals on the job and do not live near an industrial facility.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 03:40:59 -0500
Reply
My apologies for the sloppy English in my previous post. I was off to a
7:00am start for rowing training, so I threw my response together a bit
too hastily.

This brings me to the point of this second post: maintaining energy levels
on a low-carb diet. I mentioned that I had no problems in this respect.
Let me give you now a couple of examples.

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Matt Metzgar
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:58:41 -0500
Reply
A question: In Faigan's NHE, carb-loading takes place every 3 or 4 days. I
am interested in trying this, but I would like a better theoretical base.
Would this type of situation have happened in the Paleo world? In other
words, would HGs have somehow naturally carb-loaded every few days?

My only idea is that when they were not successful on the hunt (and
therefore had little protein and fat to consume), they would eat mainly
frutis, vegetables, nuts, & berries, and therefore "carb-load" in a sense.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 03:30:13 -0500
Reply
There is a profile of Robb together with a pic on the same site that
carries his article on CRAN.

Check out the relaxed poise at

http://girevikmagazine.com/Girevik/First/profile.htm

Keith
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:43:20 -0500
Reply
Can I toss this idea in for comment? I'd be really interested in your
views.

Where people write about Evolutionary Fitness or the Paleo lifestyle
(usually diet) and our human ancestors, they often refer to eras or date
ranges to indicate a benchmark 'Golden Age' which epitomizes most fully
the distinguishing features they want to emphasize.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Dave Fobare
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:16:19 -0600
Reply
Much thanks Rob!

I do have a couple of followups --

I did note that the word "book" was mentioned in your intro as well as by
the good Dr himself late in the interview. Did you get any sense as to when
this tome would be finished? I just had to ask.

There is a passage in one of Art's answers:

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Robert Wolf
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:32:00 +0000
Reply
I just wanted to alert the list that Art Devany has a new interview here:

http://girevikmagazine.com/six/interviewdevany.htm

and an article by yours truly:

http://girevikmagazine.com/six/calrestriction.htm

Enjoy!
Reply
No Replies
Matt Metzgar
Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:48:47 -0500
Reply
Babies' Mental Delay Tied to Moms' Vegan Diet:

http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid=34&in=health&cat=diet_and_nutrition
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:53:54 -0500
Reply
A good journalist’s overview of the complex causes of present epidemic of
obesity, the commercial interests of the fast food industry - and the muck
put they in mass food in the interests of the processors rather than the
consumers, a reference to hunter-gatherer food (sadly wrong), the need for
more exercise, is to be found at:

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 01:51:57 -0500
Reply
Do you know of any posters or 2003 wall calendars, suitable for display in
my office, which exemplify human evolution? I don't want anything too
subtle (such as a mother and child painting which depicts human bonding,
nurturing etc) as I want to use the display to stimulate interest and
discussion. There is the evolvefish.com product range, including their
2003 calendar - but I don't want to have my nose punched in:

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Sat, 18 Jan 2003 07:49:05 -0500
Reply
Back on 21 August 2002 I alerted you to the then-recent film Atanarjuat.
I saw it a month ago and here are some observations. I don’t go to the
cinema often enough to call the following a ‘review’ and, in any case, I
focus here on what I see as most relevant to Evolutionary Fitness – and
plenty was!

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 2 Replies
Matt Metzgar
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:05:46 -0500
Reply
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before, but Loren Cordain has put
up a website to supplement his book. It contains research papers that can
be downloaded:

www.thepaleodiet.com
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 06:53:42 -0500
Reply
The New Scientist website, www.newscientist.com, tells us that the US
edition of that magazine has been available weekly since October 2002.
This high quality, critical news magazine gives prominence to discoveries
and insights in human evolution, human health, diet and complexity. It
rarely covers exercise, but – for our purposes – makes up by publishing a
lot of material which is _implicitly_ rather than _explicitly_ stimulating
and informative to the Evolutionary Fitness thinker.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Vicki Bishop
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:11:47 -0500
Reply

Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:03:36 -0500
Reply
The FAQ for this list has been up-dated and is available on line at
http://www.evfit.com/faq.htm

This FAQ is a living, breathing document. If you would like to add to it
or suggest enhancements (bearing in mind the need to keep the overall FAQ
down to a manageable size), please e-mail me at [log in to unmask]

My apologies for the period of some months during which the FAQ was not
available on line.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Theola Walden Baker
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:09:13 -0600
Reply
Here's kind of a nifty nutrient calculator. Click on any header to re-sort
the data from least to most for whatever nutrient you're interested
n. --But several non-paleo foods are here, too.

http://www.newtreatments.org/Nutrients/Acidity

Theola
Reply
No Replies
Theola Walden Baker
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 23:44:06 -0600
Reply
Am I wrong or doesn't the *ash* content of a food (as per the USDA Nutrient
Database) reflect pH? Maybe I'm confusing this with something else.

Keith, there's still hope for your wife. :-) If I hadn't done the Eades'
Protein Power with good success over 2 yrs ago, I may never have found and
gone Paleo. It was a logical progression for me. It was only after I went
Paleo that I got a copy of the Eades' LifePlan book. Their most stringent
level adheres pretty well to Paleo. Since she likes the Eades' diet and
wants to stick

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 8 Replies
Keith Thomas
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:10:59 -0500
Reply
Lots to comment upon here and so many questions to ask!

1. Acid/alkaline - for Robb

Robb says:

> if I do not add huge quantities
> of olive oil to most meals it is
> fairly easy for me to reach
> a net alkaline state …

What do you mean by ‘huge’? I add about 30ml to a salad and regard that
as moderate. 60ml I would regard as large and anything over 100ml
as ‘huge’ for a single meal. Are we on the same wavelength?

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
Keith Thomas
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 06:59:48 -0500
Reply
From: "Robert Wolf"
Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:10 AM
Subject: Net alkalinizing diet

>I put this question to the list a few days ago amidst
>another message and received no responses so I am
>going to try again! On the topic of acid/base
>balance and eating a net alkalinizing diet as Loren
>Cordain recommends, what are your thoughts?
>For me fruit seems to be a more dense and easily
>accessible source for an alkaline load but I digestively
>do not tolerate fruit well and immediately experience
>what I would describe as "carb head".
>I am curious if others have any

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
J.F.Brumby
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:37:53 -0000
Reply
A guide to healthy eating and exercising.This is a good book as a primer
for those who have a non scientific back ground.It explains the principles
behind paleo nutrition and exercise in terms that are easy to follow and
therefore commence the programme.It has a different format from the usual
books with the principles on one page and the key memorable phrases on the
facing page.This is a work-book as one reads further you can enter
information onto this work page creating your own work book record.

[More ...]
Reply
No Replies
J.F.Brumby
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:40:26 -0000
Reply
The paleolithic diet may have a variable amount of meat and plant depending
on the natural resources available eg inuit 90% animal/fish.Is there any
information about how a group that has been genetically eating one form of
paleo diet but then transfers to another paleo diet.This is not the same as
a ethnic group eating a modern diet.I would suggest that it may have a
deleterious effect changing from a high animal hunter- gathering diet to a
high plant hunter-gathering diet over ashort period of time
-----Original Message-----
From: Evolutionary Fitness Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Automatic digest processor
Sent:

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply
Keith Thomas
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 07:22:46 -0500
Reply
About 70 years ago, Weston Price found evidence that US soils were
depleted. Writing about phosphorous, which is essential for mammalian
health, he said ‘Now when we realize that a 60 bushel crop per acre of
wheat or corn will remove from the soil about 25 pounds of phosphorous per
acre, or one fortieth of the total content in the top 7 inches, we are
immediately confronted with the fundamental, controlling problem that we
have, accordingly, only enough phosphorous in the average soil for forty
excellent crops ...’ The idea has been picked up by other writers
(e.g., ‘Empty Harvest’)

[More ...]
Reply
Show Replies 1 Reply


ATOM RSS1 RSS2