ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karen Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Echurch-USA The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 01:41:45 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (6 kB)
There is a book in the Bible book store I was going to buy one last month but did not have enough money. I think it is the biblical diet.  It tell what foods and how to prepare them.  I am not sure of the exact title though.  I seenit advertized on the 700 club and PTL>
--
I would rather live my life as if there is a God, and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't, and die to find out there is

IN GOD WE TRUST
-KC- Ministries


-------------- Original message --------------

> Seafood is especially bad. Turkey? Scavengers? Ummm they forage but they
> don't eat road kill and etc. At least not that I'm aware of. I'm not
> certain on the Leviticus stand on Turkey one would have to check it out.
> And no I won't be having ham *smile*. I've noticed people tend to get very
> defensive of the foods of today when matched to the Leviticus rules. Not
> that you are, but I know many do. There is no commandment to not get drunk
> either, but God says don't do it man don't do it. People, or I ought say,
> Christians for the most part, don't have issue with that rule lol. If I
> can find the name of the book I'll post it. It is a doctor of medicine who
> took the various foods and matched them nutritionally to God's guide and ge
> whiz, God was on to something with his rule, they actually are the
> healthiest... and the stuff he said to stay away from is high in toxins and
> cholesterol... who'd a thunk! lol.
>
> Brad
>
>
> At 07:33 AM 12/1/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> >I take it then, Brad that you won't be having ham for Christmas! I
> >feel sorry for all the Maine lobstermen too. Don't turkeys do some
> >scavenging too? HMMMM! GRIN!
> >Kathy
> >
> >
> >At 08:29 PM 11/30/2005, you wrote:
> > >Kathy,
> > >
> > >India must have had Lamb, fish, chicken, etc.? The reason I think the
> > >Leviticus foods are still applicable today is because it is clearly based
> > >out of a nutrition and cleanliness issue. Scavengers are high in toxins
> > >while clean meat and foods are low cholesterol and etc. We can prove this
> > >out in today's science what God knew back then because he created them. It
> > >never was a "law" to eat only the foods in Leviticus, it looked to me that
> > >God was giving wise guidelines to follow. If one chooses to alter from
> > >that, I suppose they pay the price, like we see happening today. The
> > >sacrifice of the animals is done with Christ, but we still need to eat, and
> > >I don't think God has made pig any cleaner today than it was centuries ago.
> > >
> > >Brad
> > >
> > >
> > >At 09:20 AM 11/30/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >Brad,
> > > >I do believe that food restrictions were eliminated as well. After
> > > >all, Jesus said, "Go in to all the world." If the disciples had to
> > > >take there dietary restrictions with them where ever they went, how
> > > >could Paul then be all things to all people? Don't forget, church
> > > >tradition says that Andrew ended up in India. If that is true, in
> > > >India, then he wouldn't have been able to eat cow meat. He would
> > > >have had to eat something else!
> > > >Kathy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >At 03:06 PM 11/29/2005, you wrote:
> > > > >According to Leviticus, God gave his people some very simple but easy to
> > > > >determine guidelines for food they ought eat. Fish that have
> > > scales and not
> > > > >those without, not to eat scavengers, but to eat hooved animals that
> > chew
> > > > >their cud and etc.
> > > > >
> > > > >How then does the New Testament' scriptures that speak of unclean being
> > > > >clean apply? Granted I know Peter's trance or dream or whatever was
> > > > >netaphorically speaking of the visitors he was about to get who were
> > > > >gentiles and not Jews, but is there a food related application to it as
> > > > >well? Curious of your thoghts. Has the New Testament made the Leviticus
> > > > >rules obsolete in any way.
> > > > >
> > > > >Rom 14:19-21
> > > > >19 So then we pursue the things which make for peace and the
> > > building up of
> > > > >one another.
> > > > >20 Do not tear down the work of God for the sake of food. All
> > > things indeed
> > > > >are clean, but they are evil for the man who eats and gives offense.
> > > > >
> > > > >Acts 10:11-16
> > > > >11 and he saw the sky opened up, and an object like a great sheet coming
> > > > >down, lowered by four corners to the ground,
> > > > >12 and there were in it all kinds of four-footed animals and crawling
> > > > >creatures of the earth and birds of the air.
> > > > >13 A voice came to him, "Get up, Peter, kill and eat!"
> > > > >14 But Peter said, "By no means, Lord, for I have never eaten anything
> > > > >unholy and unclean."
> > > > >15 Again a voice came to him a second time, "What God has cleansed, no
> > > > >longer consider unholy."
> > >
> > >Brad
> > >
> > > Place your FREE classified ad at HTTP://WWW.RIVERCITIESCONNECTION.COM
> > > Northwestern Wisconsin and Greater Twin Cities classified connection!
>
> Brad
>
> FREE classified ads at HTTP://WWW.RIVERCITIESCONNECTION.COM
> Try our "Talking Classifieds". Serving NW Wisconsin & Greater Twin Cities
> area!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2