Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:11:58 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree Bob. I don't even have an IRLP node I can hit.
The nearest is in Saint Jo, and unlike the Saint Jo
repeater that comes in full quieting, I can't even
hear the IRLP node. If there's enough interest, I even
know of a conference that might be used. All I have to
do is ask. It's a UK conference, so if the net was in
the evening, it isn't very active anyway after about
5:00 central.
--- KA5ETA <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dan why would you want to use irlp? I would think
> that echolink would be
> better. We all have a computer, the way I
> understand it, irlp will not let
> computers join the network. On the other hand
> echolink will allow computers
> to use the network. I am sure that one of the
> conference rooms would let us
> have a time for a net or we could agree to use that
> one room for a meeting
> place.
> Bob KA5ETA
> Echo-link node 28599
> 442.150R
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Kysor" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:18 AM
> Subject: blind hams irlp
>
>
> > just wondering if blind hams could use an irlp
> node to chat back and
> forth-
> > anyone have any suggestions.
> > dan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
|
|
|