PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ben Moore <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Mar 2002 09:12:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I've read several different threads in newsgroups talking about instability
over time. Someitmes there was just no explanation for it.  Processors that
would initally overclock would lose that capability.  I'd look for something
physical that had changed.  Is there a lot of dust in the cpu fan and heat
sink?  Have you added components that increase the heat inside the case? Are
you monitoring case and cpu temps? Reapply the thermal paste on the cpu
heatsink. People are finding out that some types tend to run over time.

Ben Moore


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex E Onslow" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 1:20 PM
Subject: [PCBUILD] Do CPU's gradualy become more unstable?


> When I brought my Athlon Duron I had it clocked from a 700 to an 850. Over
a
> period of about 6 months it became more and more unstable until my PC was
> virtually un-usuable so I had to put the clock speed back to 700. I know
this
> was not a software problem as I had reformated many times. This raises the
> question of whether CPU's gradualy become more unstable. By setting it
back
> to 700 am I just prolonging the inevitable? Or will it be fine from now
on?
>
> Alex Onslow

        The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
       tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
           Visit our web site to signup: http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2