PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Earl Truss <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 May 2000 18:32:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Rode <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] Dual Simms board


> Yes but it is the difference between 70ns which is typical for FPM RAM
and
> 80 which is typical for 30 pin. The extra Ram makes up for the loss in
> timing and it is a 486 with a couple of specific jobs so any small
> performance hit isn't going to be a big issue. Does anybody know if
the
> parity issue between the 72 and 30 pin back is a certainty.....it must
match?
>
Toward the end of 30-pin SIMMs, they were usually 70ns also - same as
the 72-pin SIMMs.

            Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
                    Digest mode - visit our web site:
                    http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2