Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 May 2011 14:24:03 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
ham radio for the sakeof ham radio without ever turning on a radio is a pathetic waste of time and I'd turn inmy license if I couldn't operate
On May 3, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Richard Fiorello wrote:
> I just can't resist. I don't think things have dumbed down at all just
> changed. I'm not talking so much about the exams but day to day
> activity. Radio has become more and more computer dependant whether I
> like it or not. My drake tr4 back in 1973 didn't know what a menu was.
> It was wonderful.
> As someone else very correctly mentioned problems are made worse by the
> fact that more and more hams are living in locations where antennas are
> a problem. Also the average age in many clubs is getting much older and
> there just isn't that zest to tackle that 60 foot tower.
> In my locality I have found that eager helpers for those projects I find
> challenging aren't nearly as available as they were in yester year.
> Partially because life is more busy and partially because many folks
> just aren't up to the task.
> The club I belong to has a number of extras who have no station and
> other than limited club activity haven't operated from their own qth.
> Something really dumb like a requirement to work all states prior to
> taking the extra exam would start a lively debate.
> The club president who teaches classes for new hams has no station or
> antenna.
> I don't think he is into echo link either. Ham radio for the sake of
> ham radio without ever turning on a radio is a interesting thought.
>
> --
> richard
|
|
|