RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lucia Ruedenberg Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 13:28:37 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (16 lines)
well of course, it means it might not exist. and yes they are aware of,
and strongly suspect/suggest, that possibility. Still, scientifically,
just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
HOWEVER, you certainly cannot go around saying something exists without
proving it.

Lucia

> I disagree.  If something has not been proven to exist, that most
> certainly DOES mean that it might not exist.  What is being found
> might be just an experimental artifact of some sort.  The Perth Group
> seems, from what I've read, to be well aware of that possibility.
>
> Carol
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2