BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Keithley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:18:19 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
The phasing exciters had superb audio quality.

----- Original Message -----
From: Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 1:39 pm
Subject: Re: phasing vs. filter exciters

>
>
> The phasing exciters didn't have very good carrier suppression and 
> often the unwanted sideband was nearly as loud as the desired 
> one.  What a difference fifty years makes!
> Pat, K9JAUAt 03:01 PM 4/1/2015, you wrote:
> >You are probably right, that waws a bit before my time.  I know my
> >national ncx 200 tranceiver had a vfo that was same no matter what band
> >you were on, they switched crystals.  40 and 15 actually tuned the
> >opposite directions, very strange.  Swan, at least the ones I had,
> >actually switched vfo frequencies when you changed bands.  No days,
> >everything is locked to one master oscilator which is way cool.
> >73
> >Butch
> >WA0VJR
> >Node 3148
> >Wallace, ks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2