BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Howard, W A 9 Y B W" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:03:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
My first SSB transmitter was a Hallicrafters HT-37.  I still have it but it 
has been boxed up for about forty years.  When it was packed away, it had 
some problems.  It sure did have good sounding audio.

Howard #3
W A 9 Y B W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: phasing vs. filter exciters


> Yes those old rigs were great but more work hi hi.  I remember how the old
> Hallicrafters HT 37 sounded but I could not afford one.  My brother still
> has one in excellent shape I think.
>
>
>
> ED K7UC
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Lou Kolb
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 4:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: phasing vs. filter exciters
>
> They sure did. On those rare occasions when I could get one tuned in
> properly on my Halicrafters S38, they sounded just like AM. At least until
> the receiver drifted up or down. Usually took 3 to 5 seconds. Man, they 
> were
> broad and touchy. A friend of mine had the Apache and SB10 conbination and
> had to renull the carrier before every transmission. Great memories. 73. 
> Lou
> WA3MIX
> Lou Kolb
> Voice-over Artist:
> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
> Messages On-hold:
> www.loukolb.com
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Keithley" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 5:18 PM
> Subject: Re: phasing vs. filter exciters
>
>
>> The phasing exciters had superb audio quality.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 1:39 pm
>> Subject: Re: phasing vs. filter exciters
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The phasing exciters didn't have very good carrier suppression and
>>> often the unwanted sideband was nearly as loud as the desired
>>> one.  What a difference fifty years makes!
>>> Pat, K9JAUAt 03:01 PM 4/1/2015, you wrote:
>>> >You are probably right, that waws a bit before my time.  I know my
>>> >national ncx 200 tranceiver had a vfo that was same no matter what band
>>> >you were on, they switched crystals.  40 and 15 actually tuned the
>>> >opposite directions, very strange.  Swan, at least the ones I had,
>>> >actually switched vfo frequencies when you changed bands.  No days,
>>> >everything is locked to one master oscilator which is way cool.
>>> >73
>>> >Butch
>>> >WA0VJR
>>> >Node 3148
>>> >Wallace, ks. 


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2