PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Sep 1998 17:44:36 -0800
Reply-To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
David Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
General Magic
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On 28 Sep 98 at 9:11, Breck Schwartz wrote:

> >I recently saw advertised in a paper a 586 133mghz computer.  I'm
> >familiar with 486 and the pentium series since.  Was there something in
> >the interim?
>
>
> It has always been my understanding that the 586 was the designation that
> Cyrix and AMD gave their Pentium equivalent chips. Just as they now
> advertise more advanced chips as 686s.

  No, it was AMD's designation for their "advanced" 486, with support
for 4x multiplier and/or 40 MHz motherboard speed, both beyond
anything Intel offered for the 486.
  [Intel was caught between a rock and a hard place -- if they tried
to trademark the "586" designation, their whole set of x86 trademarks
could unravel, which is why they left 586 un-trademarked and used the
name "Pentium" instead.]

David G

                                  -----
       **Need help with PCBUILD mailing list? Send an Email to:**
        Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]> or Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2