PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Kristina Carlton <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:22:09 -0500
text/plain (27 lines)
Supposedly pigs are 80% like humans and therefore it is not healthy to eat
them - besides the fact that they are scavengers and will eat feces and/or
their own young among other things.

Here is what Mercola has to say:

"Pigs are scavenger animals and are frequently contaminated with parasites
that aren't removed through the cooking process. It would be best to avoid
all ham and pork products. Pork can be heavily contaminated with mold spores
in its fat and is also used in labs to culture cancer cells, because it
increases their growth."

On 6/9/06, Jerry Stegenga <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 6/9/2006 10:37:44 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> he's  convinced that pork is toxic to humans....
>
>
>
>
> I am convinced that it is not!    Maybe he is  Jewish?   Jerry Steg
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2