Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:13:26 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-
> One, as noted by Danial Quinn, so long as we
> keep increasing the human food supply, the human population will keep
> increasing--so the simple way to reduce the population is to put a cap on
> the food supply. By eating paleo, we do that. This doesn't mean people
> presently living will starve, but that new people will not be born.
>
How is it that new people will not be born by eating paleo?
It is an observed fact that there is a regulation of births and populations
in wild animals and also in Huntergatherers ( there is also a regulation by
deaths) This phenomenon is yet to receive plausible explanations .
The bonobos for exemple who play with sexe a lot still don't have more
births than their environment can handle.
Malinowski studying the trobriand islands have noted the inability of teen
agers to get pregnant despite a very rich sexe life.
One thing observed By Malinowski was that more partners the teen agers had
and less conceptions was happenning , only the married women were getting
pregnant .
There is more to conception than the meeting of a spermatozoid and an ovule
, hard to get for a scientist.
Also the peoples eating instinctively undenatured food, have observed a
drop of endogenus stimulation of the nervous system due to denatured
molecules circulating in the blood , openning to new sensitivities and
lowering the need for discharging copulation .
way more to learn on that subject
By the way i am expecting a baby at the end of the month.
I don't do sexe often but when i do with the intent of procreating it just
works.
jean-claude
|
|
|