jean'claude:
>I see it the other way around if we were not wanting to separate ourselves
>from our source , if we didn't carry the guilt of the original sin , if we
>were feeling one  with the rest of creation, we will have no need to
>denature our food, no need to technicalise birth and death, no need to
>bottle fed babies, no need to be unsensitive to the despair of a child in a
>crib etc... etc..

And we "want to separate ourselves from the source", we "carry the guilt of
original sin", we don't feel one with the rest of creation" because of what?

Your version above of the "paleo religion" above tends to exemplify what I
am speaking of in this thread.

>Teaching what we need to learn . Every body do that , KIrt included,.

Everyone doesn't evengelize what the other fellow should think. Indeed,
most people don't in my experience. I suspect such behavior was very
minimal in h-g's, but who knows?

>that
>is an attempt to convince ourselves of our sameness . of our oneness .
>We are craving that feeling because we deprive ourselve from that reality.by
>thinking we have and can be  separated from god ,Nature or our source
> whatever we name it ).

And you seem to believe that non-paleo ways separate us from god. Again,
this sort of extremism is what I am talking about.

>The fact is that it is impossible. no matter how far we can strech our bond
>we will have to come back to it.

I am not sure that is a fact at all.

>Never mind i am just teaching myself!

Now you got it!

Cheers,
Kirt