PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Raw meat.. less is more - beef nutrients cooked
From:
William Schnell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 22:09:34 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
Organization:
some
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
I saw no enzymes listed in that comparison.

William



07/03/01 9:20:02 AM, Ingrid Bauer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

snip

>and neither contain any amino acids that the other doesn't.
>
>
>This kind of comparaison don't say nothing about the assimilability of the
>nutrients.
>
>Then what  kind of denaturation is required to ANALYSE a piece of raw meat .
>I am pretty sure heat is involved.
>Analyse is the last tool to use to evaluate the wholeness of a food.
>
>jean-claude
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2