 
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:35:32 -0600 |
| In-Reply-To: |
<4133701.1117745953023.JavaMail.root@sniper9> |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Surely this does not apply to all places of the world.
The graph I used, which I can no longer get to since the page has
apparently been deleted, showed lactose intolerance to be lowest in the
U.S., Northern Europe, and Australia (something like 10-20% of the
population), and highest in China and among Native Americans (90%+). In
fact, in a few really isolated areas, it was near 100%.
My point was that if pasteurization is truly the demon he said it is, and
is truly a "cause" of lactose intolerance, then wouldn't the countries who
use the most pasteurized products have the highest incident of lactose
intolerance? Is my logic faulty in some respect?
|
|
|
