Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEODIET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEODIET Archives

Paleolithic Diet Symposium List

PALEODIET@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEODIET Home PALEODIET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
French Paradox
Don Wiss <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:37:35 -0400
text/plain (15 lines)
When people look for reasons for the French Paradox they look for what they
are adding to their diet to get protective benefits. Todd Moody suggests
they are eating more organ meats and root vegetables. Recent news article
suggest it comes from their drinking red wine. This focus on what to add
probably comes from a marketing mentality. If we can just find what it is
we can sell it to everybody else.

I, on the other hand, have the theory that it comes from what they don't
eat. So my theory is the paradox comes from their consuming less trans
fats. They use real butter, not margarine. They tend not to deep fry foods.
French fries are pan fried in oil. In general they eat real foods, not fake
ones. Does this makes sense to anyone else?

Don.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV