Bro Haruna,



 



Thanks! I am truly getting enlightened on Harunasilo. To be honest with you, I got lost on this one. I only saw Harunasilo only as a nomenclature not religion. Go after LJD, cuz he invited me into. 



 



The reason why I forwarded JC of Spain, because it was easier for me to think broader. 



 



Later & thanks,



Yj









There is no god but Allah (SWT) and Muhammad (SAW) is His messenger. Fear and Worship only Allah alone!







 







Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:02:08 -0400

From: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: A CASE FOR COALITION/JC

To: [log in to unmask]





JC, you do have the air of Royalty about you, now that I think about it.

 

But allow me to remind you again: Harunasilo is the Religion of Harunamos.

Haruna.



-----Original Message-----

From: Y Jallow <[log in to unmask]>

To: [log in to unmask]

Sent: Thu, Oct 22, 2009 10:20 am

Subject: Re: A CASE FOR COALITION/JC











http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSck15UFrQQ

 

It will be interesting to know Haruna's nomenclature (Harunasilo).

 

Find video of King Juan Carlos of Spain.

 

thanks,

yj

 

 



 



There is no god but Allah (SWT) and Muhammad (SAW) is His messenger. Fear and Worship only Allah alone!





  





Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:19:24 -0500

From: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: A CASE FOR COALITION

To: [log in to unmask]







Point there, bro!

 

I wish Haruna can just call me YJ/Yero or simply Dalton.

 

I saw everyone accepting Harunasilo,eg. Malanding (Kukeh), Bailo (Evian), Ms. Diab (Zabu...), Forums (Ellen), Kristine (Sukuro), LJD (JDAM), etc...I finalized that is Harunasilo purely. It reminds me an extended grandfather (of beloved memory). He had a jola nick-name for every child (grandson/daughter) in that compound before died. Names like Dembesa, Landing Jarjou, Tumbuli, etc...

 

thanks,

yj





 



There is no god but Allah (SWT) and Muhammad (SAW) is His messenger. Fear and Worship only Allah alone!





  





Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:41:52 +0000

From: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: A CASE FOR COALITION

To: [log in to unmask]













ATT Jr

 

Why did you respond to an incomplete piece?

 

Thanks for your thoughts, and I discussed Cicero only because you invoked the man.

 

Why do you refer to YJ, as JC, and any serious progress on Harunasilo?

 

Suntou provoked a nuclear war with a mere pistol, and I wonder what your thoughts are on the issue of relocating the African Center out of Banjul.

 

 

 

 

LJDarbo



--- On Tue, 20/10/09, Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:





From: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: A CASE FOR COALITION

To: [log in to unmask]

Date: Tuesday, 20 October, 2009, 5:49























[ATT Jr then] JDAM.

 

Very well. I thank you JDAM.

 

[I wrote on what Gainako assigned, and yes the topic could easily accomodate Madison v Marbury. In the

process of writing, I actually refreshed on that seminal 1803 case that established, among others, the principle

of judicial review.] JDAM.

 

Indeed. I was going to change the friggin assignment ever so slightly. Perhaps that was why Demba pre-empted.

I do acknowledge your treatment of the case and I was pleased. I had wanted to elaborate on concept to

drive home the anxieties over Juris-vestiture. You spoke on the malignancy from a point of view of remuneration

and I thought the principle of in-built or re-constructed cordon would have been powerful complement and

innoculation. It was inspiration from your discussion that accrued that opportunity. Next time.

 

[In terms of precedential value, M v M is quite vital, but there is no denying it remains an integral part of the

intellectual progeny of Federalist 78. To avoid saturating my assignment with quotations, I settled for the latter,

especially since it addresses the central question of the recent dispute between ML, and Yanks, on the

appropriate contours of the sovereign's legislative competence.] JDAM.

 

I agree and it was artfully done that way.

 

[Our 1997 Constitution fully embraced the view of Federalist 78 that laws in excess of the constitution are void.]

JDAM.

Yes as they should be. It will be interesting to note that Federalists 50's to the 70's never pretended to portray

a constitution as the unmalleable and incontrovertible document that some who are averse to jurisprudence are

wont to fear. The difference is that to the extent it has an in-built and self-review mechanism, many a legislative

rebellion has been pre-empted. Thanks to Madison, Hamilton, the MVM court, and other such greats.

 

[On the unity project, all you and I can do is advocate, and nothing whatsoever should prevent us from doing so

as loudly as possible.] JDAM.

 

I agree.

 

[Roles may be different, but the aspiring leaders are urged to play their part as they see fit.] JDAM.

I join you in urging the aspiring leaders to play their crucial parts variously and in unison.

 

[At the end of the day, we are dealing with a national project, and I am not the least detained by the

consequences you fear.] JDAM.

 

I share with you that any consequences that may arise from genuine national enterprise must not be feared.

If it is feared and avoided, it necessarily is INCONSEQUENTIAL and therefore of no moentous value. I fear

nothing in this life JDAM. Perhaps I could have phrased my notes differently. Any fright purveyed was totally

unintended. I meant to emphasize individual liberty even in considerations of NATIONAL ENTERPRISE.

 

[Life may be about petty quarell but what is so significant that people at the edge of the same precipice cannot

cooperate in rescuing themselves.] JDAM.

 

Nothing ought to be so significant that you cannot defend your own life, much less with support and assistance

from similarly-situated victims. I share with you though that you must positively come to that frame of mind at

some point prior to your self-defense. This is the reason I encouraged you to review Cicero. In other words

fears and common burdens are themselves not the sole or even crucial determinants in decision matrices.

That is exactly why I shared we reconsider methods. It is mental torture to be so highly convinced of gravity, yet

be dazzled by man's seeming idiocy to defy it. It was yet another herculean task to convince that the sun

(not the earth) was the center of the universe. I understood what Gallileo must have gone through.

 

[I am merely participating in the conversation for an effective front against the Professor, and I am not sure your

"Plinys" should be averse to that.] JDAM.

 

Indeed, and I am with you on that score. I also should not think the Plinys ought to be averse to that. I simply

suggest alternative methods and not to exhaust any one method before your cardinal goal matures.

 

[In any case, I urge you not to spend a dime of your resources on an electoral project that does not present a

united front against the Professor in 2011, if indeed there is a 2011 in electoral terms.] JDAM.

 

I am far ahead of you. I have made that promise years ago.

 

[Ever the philosopher, you must taunt me with that giant of Roman antiquity. Years before he became Rome's

leading advocate in the courts, and later counsul, Cicero's tutor, the great Molon, who was Greek, assessed him

thus:  “Cicero, I congratulate you and I am amazed at you. It is Greece and her fate that I am sorry for. The only

glories that were left to us were our culture and our eloquence. Now I see that these too are going to be taken

over in your person by Rome.�] JDAM.

 

I understood the affection was mutual. Leave it to the Greeks to put Romans so surreptitiously in their place. I am

confident Cicero regarded the polite insult thusly. The great battle between Venice and Thessaloniki revived.

I enjoy the reminiscence nonetheless.

 

[If you invoke Cicero, you must challenge your aspiring leaders. Sit on your money until you see something useful

coming out of opposition Gambia.] JDAM.

 

I will sit on my farthings. However, I must share with you that it is not enough, nor do I think it particularly

significant to starve your Great Union's constituents inorder to coerce a union. I encourage you to look at this

union thing from a couple more angles you may not have explored already. Our aims and desires are common

our methods must be synthesized. Your unyielding advocacy must be complemented with ample lubricant

to smooth her rougher edges. 

 

[You have my encouragement to sit on KT's, and Dampha's, as well.] JDAM.

 

KT and Dampha, gentlemen all, may have some helpful perspectives to share with us in order that our synthesis

is most potent. I want to believe they are not averse to a United Front (Opposition or not) to prosecute 2011

were there to be one.

 

[I love you too, and leav....] JDAM.

 

I thank you. I love you too. Haruna.



--- On Mon, 19/10/09, Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



From: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: A CASE FOR COALITION

To: [log in to unmask]

Date: Monday, 19 October, 2009, 0:46





JDAM my dear friend, and quit calling me ATT or Dadis. I will gladly take ATT jr.

 

I admire your love for the founding of the greatest democracy on earth, now second only to Mali. Were it not for force majeure reasons, I had intended to file a rejoinder to your treatise in celebration of that most illustrious paper - Gainako. Bearing ever so deliberately on James Madison's sobriety in fashioning the constitution of a United States of America. DaarManso will accord me another oportunity. The question was not "What is the value of the Judiciary in rule of law quadrilaterals". Verily, the high moment were mutual cordons of the quadrilateral. Which you touched on ever so casually. Marbury V. Madison offered us inspiration. Demba was too lazy to extend the anniversary celebration another friggin month. I digress.

 

I am confident you are aware that I concur with your sentiments in the main vis-a-vis a prospective coalition. And I have always admired your challenges of the "aspiring leaders". The critical words were "aspiring leaders". I understand you proceed in the halo of Martyrdom, but I encourage you all the same to review Cicero, of whom you and I are inspired. Your demarche was and still is honorable. However you risked becoming counterproductively abrasive in your incessant if demure challenge of the Plinys.

 

Cicero charges - Would it were the confluence of our perspectives, would you have entertained sleight? Were it time the matter, you should be confident you could bear on mine. Au gratis. You and I had many a lengthy conversation on this Coalition matter and I swear we are in unison as to understandings. I must hold no brief for anyone, including aspiring leaders, but I shall defend their intrinsic rights to Freedom of association and to Martyrdom or national edification. That is paramount. Aspiration to leadership never inures disdain or great expectations. It is unripened ambition and therefore inconsequential. It behooves you to attach to it. And forget the acronym NADD.

 

The invincibility of such an adhoc Coalition ought to be mutually exclusive to aspirations, egos, and ambitions. You must obviate the latter from higher calling. I appreciate your chagrin. It is on method that I part with you my dear.

 

Your friend, Always,

Haruna. Don't get Juan C. all excited for nought.  

 







-----Original Message-----

From: Lamin Darbo <[log in to unmask]>

To: [log in to unmask]

Sent: Sun, Oct 18, 2009 11:51 am

Subject: Re: A CASE FOR COALITION















YJ

 

Many thanks for digging up this piece, and yes, the later-created NADD was in a position to oust the Professor (Dr as he then was) in 2006. This possibility was clearly manifested in the series of by-elections before Decision Friday 2006. It was the 'Party Leaders' who dropped the ball!

 

Haruna, aka ATT Jr, aka Dadis of Conakry, accused me of obsession with NADD, but as you can see, I was willing to both celebrate and challenge the 'Party Leaders' even pre-NADD.  

 

I urge you to develop the discipline of challenging those aspiring to govern over you before they get use to the idea that little people like you and I should just obey. On this you must ignore ATT, my friend Kejau, and our brother Dampha.

 

 

 

 

 

LJDarbo

 

 





--- On Sat, 17/10/09, Y Jallow <[log in to unmask]> wrote:





From: Y Jallow <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: A CASE FOR COALITION

To: [log in to unmask]

Date: Saturday, 17 October, 2009, 5:03











http://allgambian.net/opinion_12.html

  



Compatriots, 



  



I was reviewing LJD’s call for a coalition briefly, suddenly I recalled writing a similar piece on Allgambian in 2004. To me, it was the gaze over the distant future. As political groups are about to break the news of new proposals soon, I hereby urge you all to help get the message of unity around. Don’t waste your time and precious energy over fighting over some spilt-milk or some “unbaked� caked. Gambians, you should all strategize well, because the political temperature is in favor of the opposition. If you heed, God will multiply your energy and give you victory –inshallahu! If you choose to divide as a result of “interest�, then we are doomed again. 



  



Whistle blower, blow the whistle aloud… 



  



Humbly submitted, 



YJ/Dalton 



  



  











Mr O A N Darboe, UDP 



Hon Halifa Sallah, Hon Sidia Jatta, PDOIS 



Hon Amat Bah, NRP 



Mr Omar Jallow, PPP 



Mr Lamin Waa Juwara, NDAM 



  



  



Dear Sirs: 



  



Re: A Coalition for 2006 



  



As 2005 dawns, the urgency of the electoral project to remove The Gambia’s tyrannical man of letters, Dr Alhaji Yahya A J J Jammeh and his brutal APRC dictatorship from power cannot be overemphasised. 



  



Chosen, or de facto, you are the acknowledged leaders of your parties. You are the principals to the ongoing negotiations on the potential coalition to fight the crucial 2006 presidential election. You are the undisputed custodians of a nation’s hopes. 



  



In light of the tragic reality of life in The Gambia - unprecedented economic hardship, extraordinary repression, and heinous state criminality  - we are not requesting that you restrain your egos and personal ambitions, and put together a viable and winning coalition. We are demanding that you do so, and urgently. As a collective national  enterprise, this is the lowest legitimate expectation of every Gambian committed to the liberation of our country from the clutches of butchery. 



  



We have every confidence you will rise up to that formidable if crucial challenge and offer a hopeless people something to be hopeful about. If personal ambition overwhelms your better judgment, and compels you to deny The Gambia your support in the critical project to peaceably remove incompetence, mediocrity, unprecedented corruption and tyranny from our public life, you should seriously reconsider your position, individually and collectively, as standard bearers of national parties. 



  



You must recognise that considerations more compelling in their urgency than ego or ambition are vying for your attention. Even to the casual observer of political developments, the gathering storm over our national space must be obvious. The brutality of Dr Jammeh’s regime, as manifested in killings, arson attacks, and wrongful convictions and imprisonment of Gambians foretells an inevitable showdown with the forces for change, democratic or otherwise. The atmosphere of repression is simply not sustainable, and something has clearly got to give. As it is our contention that no Gambian deserves to be maimed or killed in a civil conflict to remove Jammeh’s dictatorship, the electoral process must be the principal route and a coalition the main vehicle. 



  



We entertain no naivety that hammering a coalition would not present special problems of intense agony. That notwithstanding, we firmly believe that those who aspire to direct the destiny of a nation must be mature and pragmatic enough to appreciate and navigate the bottlenecks inherent to a project of such gigantic and critical import. Trapped as we are under a totalitarian dictatorship in a nation without viable institutions, your challenge is akin to that of America’s founding fathers, those architects of statehood who carved the world’s most distinguished jurisdiction out of extremely acute conditions. Their enduring legacy is not the phenomenal and extraordinary material prosperity of the United States, but the creation of a nation of laws, and a land of liberty. 



  



There is no defensible rationale to suggest that Gambians are incapable of instituting a governmental system based on the rule of law. The notion that God installed Dr Jammeh and that we are therefore divinely required to accord him unquestioned obeisance must be rejected as manifestly stupid. Every people have control over their destiny, and as God does not install despots, He leaves them in place for as long as they remain unchallenged.  By our apathy we allowed despotism to thrive wonderfully. As a people we chose failure in permitting Dr Jammeh and his cabal of mental midgets, and outright brutes, to exercise a stranglehold over our public life. You must offer us redemption through a coalition for 2006. 



  



You deserve commendation for the very idea of a coalition  but the Gambian populace will reserve its accolades for the final ratification of an enterprise whose true significance, in the fullness of time, will rank for us as among the seminal political achievements and events of human history. A wrong turn and our accelerating demise into a failed state will be confirmed beyond question. The relentless brutality of Dr Jammeh’s regime threatens a national break up and you must never share in that responsibility by scuppering the only peaceable strategy to rid The Gambia of irredeemable despotism. 



  



We challenge you to think through your election agenda and market your manifesto to a people ripe for persuasion. The suffering majority of Gambians are solidly in the opposition camp, and that gain must be maintained and nurtured over the next 24 months. To assume that conditions of general hardship and insecurity means  your mission is universally appreciated will constitute a monumental misjudgement. As part of a manifesto preparation, it may be advisable to consult sector-based knowledgeable Gambians on their vision regarding some key aspects of our national life: education; agriculture; health; trade; public works; local government; tourism; and the judiciary. 



  



The area of greatest concern must of necessity be the Judiciary as ultimate interpreter of Gambian law and final arbiter of all justiciable disputes. The great sadness of our condition is that the Judiciary is co-opted in the repressive atmosphere created by Dr Jammeh’s regime. With no money, and no individual within the Judiciary of the requisite courage and intellectual calibre to articulate its needs, this financially bankrupt third of the government is in effect the orphaned child in our warped constitutional system. On the great constitutional questions of the day, the Judiciary is effectively redundant in so far as Judges and Justices  defer to Jammeh’s interpretation of the law by their reluctance to decide matters before them, and pronounce their decisions thereon. Of particular concern is the higher judiciary, especially the main originating jurisdiction in that system – the High Court. 



  



To truly appreciate the inevitability of the perverse and scandalous outcomes in some recent high profile cases in that Court, we need look no further than the contracts underlying judgeship appointments. It is widely accepted by observers within and outside the country that the Judge who presided over the cases alluded to is essentially a mercenary with no conscience. However, even jurists with no conviction either way about the direction of Gambian public life would have been seriously tempted to render less severe but equally perverse decisions in cases which should never have been docketed in a court of law. 



  



You may be wondering – and legitimately so – about how the diaspora Gambian fit in the grand vision of a coalition for 2006. We have consulted widely and there is a developing consensus that our political liberation is the responsibility of The Gambia’s sons and daughters irrespective of their geographic location. The struggle to remove the criminal government of Dr Jammeh will be a project to test the Gambian character as never before. 



  



On our part, we will do everything humanly possible to assist in the all-important task of raising sufficient funds for the coalition to launch a credible election campaign. Our public relations team is working on strategies to market the coalition’s agenda to opinion leaders in countries including the UK and the USA. The magnitude of the task dictates that we not confine our fund raising efforts to Gambian citizens, and, or other sympathetic individuals wherever they may be. We are working on the most ambitious election funding drive ever launched by Gambian opposition forces. Once a coalition becomes reality, we will consult you on other details relating to financing. Our primary condition for funding the coalition effort is only that you fulfil your side of the equation by giving us an ironclad agreement to fight 2006 as a united front. We will not associate with a tentative effort. 



  



As the political temperature in the country rises over this year and next – and it must definitely will – and as the heat pervades Jammehs several abodes, it is not inconceivable for the tyrant to put out feelers for vacating office in exchange for immunity from prosecution. In that eventuality, it is incumbent upon you as national leaders to take a longer and broader view of state security and act accordingly. You need not fret over the despot’s crimes once he is ready to head for exile. 



  



If, on the other hand, his rantings are anything to go by, the road to 2006 will bring tragedy and sorrow to a people battered by official criminality in public life. As the struggle to liberate The Gambia enters its most critical phase, your role as party and coalition leaders may expose you to ultimate danger. You must therefore educate the people on the strategy of mass demonstrations as a potent method of political dialogue should government embarked on lawlessness and extra judicial killings in the run up to the election. 



To state in categorical terms, once a coalition party leader is killed, the people must come out in their hundreds of thousands to neutralise the thuggish security forces and drive Dr Jammeh and his oppressive regime out of power. This must constitute the key strategic alternative to the election itself. Countries such as Romania, Serbia, Georgia, and Haiti are eminent forerunners in this genre for political change. Their people countered executive lawlessness and ejected their brutal and yet cowardly dictators by the sheer force of their numbers. The Gambia is ripe for such a revolution in light of the extra judicial killings, the arson attacks, widespread economic hardship, and general state criminality which are made routine features of our national life by Dr Jammeh and his thugs. 



  



In light of the intricate challenges threatening our nation’s very survival, your generation of politician and leader has a special rendezvous with destiny. Follow the stars that will lead to a new dawn for The Gambia. Follow the path of courage and determination and Gambia shall forever be grateful. A nation’s hopes are solidly in your hands. You are warned to never, never, desecrate that sacred trust. 



  



Bon voyage and God speed on the journey of a lifetime, a journey which must and will lead to our golden era of liberty from the clutches of tyranny. Dr – or is he – Yahya Jammeh must go before our beautiful country goes the way of Sierra Leone, Liberia, or Ivory Coast. And that, Sirs, is a very real possibility should you fail to agree on a coalition for 2006. 



  



  



  



Lamin J Darbo 



  



Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of The Gambia 







There is no god but Allah (SWT) and Muhammad (SAW) is His messenger. Fear and Worship only Allah alone! 











Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now. ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html 

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ 



To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html 

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html 

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ 

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html 

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html 

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ 

���������������������������������������������������������� To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ����������������������������������������������������������







New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more. 





New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more. ���������������������������������������������������������� To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html 

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ����������������������������������������������������������

 		 	   		  

_________________________________________________________________

Windows 7: It helps you do more. Explore Windows 7.

http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen3:102009