CHOMSKY Archives

The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky

CHOMSKY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Bill Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Jun 1997 23:10:49 -0700
Reply-To:
"The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Frank Scott <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<v01510100afcfe0ae82c5@[203.17.23.139]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
I think the difference between the two situations- chiapas and south
central-that makes one a riot and the other a rebellion/uprising, is that
the organized chiapas action is directed at an identified enemy, and not
simply unleashed at any convenient target. In a riot, as in south central, a
small shop keeper was more likely to be ruined than a corporate criminal,
and truly innocent people just passing or driving by, were beaten and
murdered.

The conditions that brought about a social reaction-explosion were similarly
unjust, but the form of those reactions were shaped by the social
conditions. In south central, despite what organized gangs may or may not
have done, disorganized mobs were more the order of the day. If Chomsky , or
you or I, had been driving through south central that night, we might have
had our asses kicked or been murdered.Only the government forces would do
that to us in chiapas.

fs

ATOM RSS1 RSS2