Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jul 2000 20:29:31 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
<009b01bff1e2$29bfc5c0$c24456d8@0017137736> |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
joanne <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > What I'm trying to say is that the problem isn't the List
> > Server, its because most people use a M$ program to receive
> > mail which appears to have been designed by a rather large
> > committee who didn't ask users what they wanted, just how
> > pretty can we make it look!! Sorry, can't help.
>
>
>
> Oh boy, that was beyond my understanding. However, other lists
> such as Our-Kids which is moderated by Randy Ryan have the
> reply to (private post) and reply to all ( public post) option
> and is another list on the St John's/Maelstorm group, as is
> C-palsy This made me I think it was up to the list owners to
> decide on whether to use these options. I know when I joined
> another list called Preemie Child it was set up just like
> C-Palsy until the list owner made the changes about a year
> after I joined. I assumed that the same could be done for
> c-palsy as other list owners managed to change the settings.
> Like I said before, just a suggestion to try to prevent any
> more embarrasing moments.But if you say it can't be done I'll
> have to take your word for it. Joanne Joanne
>
>
Right, back to the manuals! I'll let you know what I find out.
Thanks for the info.
Cheers
--
Deri James
dawn chorus(n): Nature's way of telling the programmer to go to sleep.
|
|
|