i think you r right. the libby case will take well
past the 2006 elections to get going. instead of
hoping for a bombshell, the dems might try an actuall
agenda. 

--- Kendall David Corbett <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> ...and in order for Congress to impeach Bush, the
> Democrats would need
> to be in control, which isn't likely unless some
> real bombshells come
> out of the Libby trial, which will be delayed until
> after the 2006
> elections, IMHO. 
> 
> Kendall 
> 
> An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's
> redundant!)
> 
> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the
> unreasonable one
> persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
> Therefore, all
> progress depends on the unreasonable man.
> 
> -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:43 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: article...
> 
> I don't like him any more than you do, Anthony, and
> I would love to  
> see him get impeached but to be scrupulously fair, I
> need to see  
> evidence.
> 
> I also think what they did to Bill Clinton was
> horrible and I think  
> turnabout would be fair play, but I don't see it
> happening.  He's too  
> wily.
> 
> Kat
> 
> On 6 Apr 2006, at 18:39, Anthony Arnold wrote:
> 
> I have given up on hope that Bush and Chaney are
> going to be removed,  
> so we
> better live through the next 3 years and promise
> ourselves that the  
> mistakes
> made won't be repeated.  Being in a red state where
> majority  
> appreciate what
> Bush and Chaney are doing for everyone of us, I'm
> just amazed that  
> people
> aren't willing to smell the roses.
> 
> Thanks,
> Anthony
> Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cerebral Palsy List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On  
> Behalf Of
> Kathleen Salkin
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: article...
> 
> If this is true, this is shocking...but before going
> all half-cocked,
> do consider the source.  This guy is under criminal
> investigation and
> is probably naming names to cut a deal.  Until I see
> an indictment
> for Bush come out, I'm going to be sceptical.
> 
> I loathe Bush, but he is innocent until proven
> guilty.
> 
> Kat
> 
> 
> On 6 Apr 2006, at 17:03, Mike Collis wrote:
> 
> I was willing to give Bush the benefit of the
> doubt...
> 
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187153/ but if this is
> true, it raises
> danger
> signals...
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> 
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> 
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> 
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> 
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 
> -----------------------
> 
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> 
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy