i think you r right. the libby case will take well past the 2006 elections to get going. instead of hoping for a bombshell, the dems might try an actuall agenda. --- Kendall David Corbett <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > ...and in order for Congress to impeach Bush, the > Democrats would need > to be in control, which isn't likely unless some > real bombshells come > out of the Libby trial, which will be delayed until > after the 2006 > elections, IMHO. > > Kendall > > An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's > redundant!) > > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the > unreasonable one > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. > Therefore, all > progress depends on the unreasonable man. > > -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kathleen Salkin [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:43 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: article... > > I don't like him any more than you do, Anthony, and > I would love to > see him get impeached but to be scrupulously fair, I > need to see > evidence. > > I also think what they did to Bill Clinton was > horrible and I think > turnabout would be fair play, but I don't see it > happening. He's too > wily. > > Kat > > On 6 Apr 2006, at 18:39, Anthony Arnold wrote: > > I have given up on hope that Bush and Chaney are > going to be removed, > so we > better live through the next 3 years and promise > ourselves that the > mistakes > made won't be repeated. Being in a red state where > majority > appreciate what > Bush and Chaney are doing for everyone of us, I'm > just amazed that > people > aren't willing to smell the roses. > > Thanks, > Anthony > Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net > -----Original Message----- > From: Cerebral Palsy List > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of > Kathleen Salkin > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:06 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: article... > > If this is true, this is shocking...but before going > all half-cocked, > do consider the source. This guy is under criminal > investigation and > is probably naming names to cut a deal. Until I see > an indictment > for Bush come out, I'm going to be sceptical. > > I loathe Bush, but he is innocent until proven > guilty. > > Kat > > > On 6 Apr 2006, at 17:03, Mike Collis wrote: > > I was willing to give Bush the benefit of the > doubt... > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187153/ but if this is > true, it raises > danger > signals... > > ----------------------- > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY > list, go here: > > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy > > ----------------------- > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY > list, go here: > > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy > > ----------------------- > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY > list, go here: > > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy > > ----------------------- > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY > list, go here: > > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy > > ----------------------- > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY > list, go here: > > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ----------------------- To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy