you vote without knowing what the people stand for?
and protest something you know nothing about? well
maybe there are lots of people who do that, but, i
don't. if i did not know anything, i just would not
vote. i think it would be less dangerous. 

--- Anthony Arnold <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The only George Bush event in Fargo North Dakota I
> remember attending was to
> protest his plan to revise social security, which I
> still don't fully
> understand since I didn't really study the pros and
> cons on, which is
> something I would suggest doing before forming a
> opinion on something.  This
> is something that most people should do before
> voting for somebody.  I might
> have voted for Bush instead of Gore in 2000, if I
> would have looked at both
> guy's records.  It would be interesting to see how
> many just vote without
> doing some homework on different candidates.  
> 
> Thanks, 
> Anthony 
> Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cerebral Palsy List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kendall David Corbett
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 5:58 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: article...
> 
> At least the guy was let in to the venue.  There's
> been more than one
> instance reported where people wearing anti-Bush
> T-shirts were prevented
> from entering places where The Shrub was speaking by
> people who appeared
> to be Secret Service.  And these were events funded
> by taxpayer dollars!
> 
> The link refers to an incident in Denver.
> 
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10420-2005Apr22.html
> 
> Anthony, I remember hearing about similar
> occurrences in Fargo.  Do
> remember anything about those?
> =20
> 
> Kendall=20
> 
> An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's
> redundant!)
> 
> The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the
> unreasonable one
> persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
> Therefore, all
> progress depends on the unreasonable man.
> 
> -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Salkin
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 3:31 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: article...
> 
> Did you hear about Bush's trip to NC yesterday?  He
> was criticised by =20
> an attendee but that guy was soundly booed.  What'd
> you expect in the =20
> South?
> 
> Kat
> 
> On 7 Apr 2006, at 18:00, Linda Walker wrote:
> 
> Bush seems very good at covering his tracks but I
> have to have hope =20
> so I am hopeful Americans wake up and that the
> Democrats in office =20
> find their backbone.
> 
> At 12:14 PM 4/7/2006, you wrote:
> > ...and in order for Congress to impeach Bush, the
> Democrats would need
> > to be in control, which isn't likely unless some
> real bombshells come
> > out of the Libby trial, which will be delayed
> until after the 2006
> > elections, IMHO.=3D20
> >
> > Kendall=3D20
> >
> > An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's
> redundant!)
> >
> > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
> the unreasonable one
> > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
> Therefore, all
> > progress depends on the unreasonable man.
> >
> > -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kathleen Salkin
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=3D20
> > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:43 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: article...
> >
> > I don't like him any more than you do, Anthony,
> and I would love to =20
> > =3D20
> > see him get impeached but to be scrupulously fair,
> I need to see =3D20
> > evidence.
> >
> > I also think what they did to Bill Clinton was
> horrible and I think =20
> > =3D20
> > turnabout would be fair play, but I don't see it
> happening.  He's =20
> > too =3D20
> > wily.
> >
> > Kat
> >
> > On 6 Apr 2006, at 18:39, Anthony Arnold wrote:
> >
> > I have given up on hope that Bush and Chaney are
> going to be =20
> > removed, =3D20
> > so we
> > better live through the next 3 years and promise
> ourselves that the =20
> > =3D20
> > mistakes
> > made won't be repeated.  Being in a red state
> where majority =3D20
> > appreciate what
> > Bush and Chaney are doing for everyone of us, I'm
> just amazed that =
> =3D20
> > people
> > aren't willing to smell the roses.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anthony
> > Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cerebral Palsy List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On =3D20
> > Behalf Of
> > Kathleen Salkin
> > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:06 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: article...
> >
> > If this is true, this is shocking...but before
> going all half-cocked,
> > do consider the source.  This guy is under
> criminal investigation and
> > is probably naming names to cut a deal.  Until I
> see an indictment
> > for Bush come out, I'm going to be sceptical.
> >
> > I loathe Bush, but he is innocent until proven
> guilty.
> >
> > Kat
> >
> >
> > On 6 Apr 2006, at 17:03, Mike Collis wrote:
> >
> > I was willing to give Bush the benefit of the
> doubt...
> >
> > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187153/ but if this
> is true, it raises
> > danger
> > signals...
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> >
> >
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3D3Dc-palsy
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> list, go here:
> >
> >
>
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3D3Dc-palsy
> >
> > -----------------------
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy