you vote without knowing what the people stand for? and protest something you know nothing about? well maybe there are lots of people who do that, but, i don't. if i did not know anything, i just would not vote. i think it would be less dangerous. --- Anthony Arnold <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > The only George Bush event in Fargo North Dakota I > remember attending was to > protest his plan to revise social security, which I > still don't fully > understand since I didn't really study the pros and > cons on, which is > something I would suggest doing before forming a > opinion on something. This > is something that most people should do before > voting for somebody. I might > have voted for Bush instead of Gore in 2000, if I > would have looked at both > guy's records. It would be interesting to see how > many just vote without > doing some homework on different candidates. > > Thanks, > Anthony > Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cerebral Palsy List > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Kendall David Corbett > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 5:58 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: article... > > At least the guy was let in to the venue. There's > been more than one > instance reported where people wearing anti-Bush > T-shirts were prevented > from entering places where The Shrub was speaking by > people who appeared > to be Secret Service. And these were events funded > by taxpayer dollars! > > The link refers to an incident in Denver. > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10420-2005Apr22.html > > Anthony, I remember hearing about similar > occurrences in Fargo. Do > remember anything about those? > =20 > > Kendall=20 > > An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's > redundant!) > > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the > unreasonable one > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. > Therefore, all > progress depends on the unreasonable man. > > -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kathleen Salkin > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=20 > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 3:31 PM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: article... > > Did you hear about Bush's trip to NC yesterday? He > was criticised by =20 > an attendee but that guy was soundly booed. What'd > you expect in the =20 > South? > > Kat > > On 7 Apr 2006, at 18:00, Linda Walker wrote: > > Bush seems very good at covering his tracks but I > have to have hope =20 > so I am hopeful Americans wake up and that the > Democrats in office =20 > find their backbone. > > At 12:14 PM 4/7/2006, you wrote: > > ...and in order for Congress to impeach Bush, the > Democrats would need > > to be in control, which isn't likely unless some > real bombshells come > > out of the Libby trial, which will be delayed > until after the 2006 > > elections, IMHO.=3D20 > > > > Kendall=3D20 > > > > An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's > redundant!) > > > > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; > the unreasonable one > > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. > Therefore, all > > progress depends on the unreasonable man. > > > > -George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kathleen Salkin > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]=3D20 > > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:43 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: article... > > > > I don't like him any more than you do, Anthony, > and I would love to =20 > > =3D20 > > see him get impeached but to be scrupulously fair, > I need to see =3D20 > > evidence. > > > > I also think what they did to Bill Clinton was > horrible and I think =20 > > =3D20 > > turnabout would be fair play, but I don't see it > happening. He's =20 > > too =3D20 > > wily. > > > > Kat > > > > On 6 Apr 2006, at 18:39, Anthony Arnold wrote: > > > > I have given up on hope that Bush and Chaney are > going to be =20 > > removed, =3D20 > > so we > > better live through the next 3 years and promise > ourselves that the =20 > > =3D20 > > mistakes > > made won't be repeated. Being in a red state > where majority =3D20 > > appreciate what > > Bush and Chaney are doing for everyone of us, I'm > just amazed that = > =3D20 > > people > > aren't willing to smell the roses. > > > > Thanks, > > Anthony > > Visit my website at www.anthonyarnold.net > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cerebral Palsy List > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On =3D20 > > Behalf Of > > Kathleen Salkin > > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:06 PM > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: Re: article... > > > > If this is true, this is shocking...but before > going all half-cocked, > > do consider the source. This guy is under > criminal investigation and > > is probably naming names to cut a deal. Until I > see an indictment > > for Bush come out, I'm going to be sceptical. > > > > I loathe Bush, but he is innocent until proven > guilty. > > > > Kat > > > > > > On 6 Apr 2006, at 17:03, Mike Collis wrote: > > > > I was willing to give Bush the benefit of the > doubt... > > > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12187153/ but if this > is true, it raises > > danger > > signals... > > > > ----------------------- > > > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY > list, go here: > > > > > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3D3Dc-palsy > > > > ----------------------- > > > > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY > list, go here: > > > > > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=3D3Dc-palsy > > > > ----------------------- > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ----------------------- To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy