Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 15 Apr 2007 23:05:34 EDT |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 4/15/2007 10:27:52 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Mike, Here's a question I have not thought of in over 35 yrs. Why
were/are green cement blocks more expensive? Way back when I was married
to a different fella we built a house using split face cement blocks. I
orginally wanted green but they wanted ten cents a block more for green,
all other colors were one price. The green pigment musta cost more, or they
didn't sell enough green block to make stocking it worthwhile. Back when I
used to do stained glass work, I was told red glass cost more than other
colors because it had gold in it. We used brown instead. Smart move. Otherwise
you'da been living in a booger-green, split face block house, and who wants
that?
We used brown mortar, it was brown all the way through, why mix up 2
batches just to make the inside and outside 2 different colors. Don't know
whether it was natural or unnatural cement but the house is still standing.
Is the ex still standing? Or was he more of the lying type?
I handled every block in that house at least twice and some more than
that.And people wonder why labor costs are high!
Ruth Ralph
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|