BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:44:12 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Well, if we're going to be sensible, we should all be on UTC and ignore
daylight altogether.

I also would agree that there should be an adjustment in the start/ending
times for DST; they should correspond with the equanoxes.  But I think we
should go to *Double* Summer Time (or what was known during WW2 as
"Wartime") during the summer.  Down with darkness! <g>

Mike Freeman

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: daylight saving time


> I agree with you, Gary.  Daylight saving time is an outdated
> concept, and no one has been able to show that it provides the
> least bit of energy savings.  If we are going to have it, it
> should only be during the Summer months when there is significant
> daylight to
> save say between Memorial day and Labor Day weekends; not 7 months
> out of the year.  They tried year round daylight saving time in
> 1974 and it failed miserably.  Part of INdiana, Arizona, Alaska and
> Hawaii have sense enough not to go to it.  73.
>
> Harvey Heagy (N.5.H.A.U.)
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2