BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:23:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
5.8 won't interfere with wireless networks and actually, the range is 
pretty good on them.2.4 isn't' bad but that can interfere with 
wireless networks though I didn't used to have much trouble when I 
had one, once in a while there were strange noises or stuff that I 
could only contribute to the network. I get better range out of my 
5.8 GHz phones anyway and the panasonic 5.8 GHz phones my mother got 
a few months ago have very good range. I was probably 1/4 of a mile 
away the other day looking for my dog and still was able to call my 
mother at work clear as a bell to tell her the dog ran away with his 
chain.  Then I found him and dropped the phone when I got him and 
it's still working.

At 09:12 AM 04/03/2006, you wrote:
>Good morning everyone.  I am planning on going out later on today, and
>getting a new cordless phone.  The one that I have has just about had it.
>I am leaning towards getting one that is either 2.4 or 5.8 GHz, and I am
>just wondering what works best in terms of range, and other features, and
>what will not interfere with any wireless LANs?  Any suggestions would be
>great, and thanks in advance.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2