BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:30:09 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (30 lines)
Thanks, how much did you pay for this phone, and does it have an answering
machine on it?





On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, John Miller wrote:

> 5.8 won't interfere with wireless networks and actually, the range is
> pretty good on them.2.4 isn't' bad but that can interfere with
> wireless networks though I didn't used to have much trouble when I
> had one, once in a while there were strange noises or stuff that I
> could only contribute to the network. I get better range out of my
> 5.8 GHz phones anyway and the panasonic 5.8 GHz phones my mother got
> a few months ago have very good range. I was probably 1/4 of a mile
> away the other day looking for my dog and still was able to call my
> mother at work clear as a bell to tell her the dog ran away with his
> chain.  Then I found him and dropped the phone when I got him and
> it's still working.
>
> At 09:12 AM 04/03/2006, you wrote:
> >Good morning everyone.  I am planning on going out later on today, and
> >getting a new cordless phone.  The one that I have has just about had it.
> >I am leaning towards getting one that is either 2.4 or 5.8 GHz, and I am
> >just wondering what works best in terms of range, and other features, and
> >what will not interfere with any wireless LANs?  Any suggestions would be
> >great, and thanks in advance.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2