thats interesting, using a feed to the remote base- perhaps 1.2 or
something like that.  Thats possible in that my repeater is at the end of
my block.
dan
At 12:59 PM 3/11/04, KA5ETA wrote:
>Dan there are two or three ways that you could get the repeater on either
>systems. The first way witch I don't really like but a lot of people are
>doing this way is to interface a radio at your house with the computer and
>have the radio on the repeater frequency. The reason I don't like this is
>that the repeater id and carrier tail and everything else goes on to
>echolink.
>The other way is to put a remote base on your repeater. Set it on a simplex
>frequency and then have a radio at your house on the same simplex frequency
>as the remote base. Of cores have that radio interfaced with the computer.
>The best way as you know would be having the computer at the repeater site,
>but as you said that is hard to do.
>Bob KA5ETA
>Echo-link node 28599
>442.150R
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dan Kysor" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 2:40 PM
>Subject: Re: blind hams irlp
>
>
> > well i wanted to link my remote base on my repeater to something on the
> > air, don't have a computer at my repeater site.
> > dan
> > At 09:09 AM 3/11/04, KA5ETA wrote:
> > >Dan why would you want to use irlp? I would think that echolink would be
> > >better. We all have a computer, the way I understand it, irlp will not
>let
> > >computers join the network. On the other hand echolink will allow
>computers
> > >to use the network. I am sure that one of the conference rooms would let
>us
> > >have a time for a net or we could agree to use that one room for a
>meeting
> > >place.
> > >Bob KA5ETA
> > >Echo-link node 28599
> > >442.150R
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Dan Kysor" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > >Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:18 AM
> > >Subject: blind hams irlp
> > >
> > >
> > > > just wondering if blind hams could use an irlp node to chat back and
> > >forth-
> > > > anyone have any suggestions.
> > > > dan
> >