BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1502\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:13:30 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Mystery antenna
From:
Buddy Brannan <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<B7.B0.14313.8D720F05@louvi-msg>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
I think part of the antenna is made with RG58 coax. I forget how much, I used to have one and it worked pretty well.
--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY



On Jan 11, 2013, at 9:55 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> That's the Mystery.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Mystery antenna
> 
> 
>> So tell us all, what is different about the "mystery antenna" Besides 
>> performance?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2