Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:20:12 +0200 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hans wrote,
>At 09:40 1999-04-07 -0700, Mary wrote:
>>Remember the posting that I think Hans kindly posted, a breakdown
of the
>>composition of bone marrow,and I think it was something like 25 g
of
>>protein, 5 g of carb. I was extremely disappointed to find out that
bone
>>marrow is not high fat, it is high protein, right?? Unless I am
mistaken..I
>>hope I am mistaken and that it IS high fat.
>
>I am not the one who dissapointed You :-)
>....
>- Hans
Mary,
Im awfully sorry to have disappointed you :-( ...
I got my data from cattle marrow ("Rind Mark" in german)
- found no other analyse for it.
Maybe the difference is from the very high water content in my
analyse:
74g water
5g fat
20g protein
If you use a less fresh marrow (less water) of course the
fat contents go up.
Looks right.
At least you have 25% as of the protein weight as fat.
That is paleolithcally a top value for our climate.
regards
Amadeus
---
Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net
|
|
|