PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"John P. Penasack" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Apr 1998 21:24:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
My original submission on my problem with system time losing time relative
to reference provided some informative responses.  I was using Atom Time to
update so I investigated information on the CMOS battery, and found out it
is  a "Dallas DS 12887 real time clock and CMOS battery integrated into the
RTC chip" and sells for $19.95.

So I sent an email to Packard Bell asking how to correct the problem and
received this terse reply:

"The battery is not replaceable."

Not completely believing I would be so lucky as to have an irreplaceable
battery, but interpreting the terseness of the PB response as being the
extent of the advice I will obtain from them, I turn to anyone with
experience to explain why the CMOS battery is not replaceable.  It can't be
that efficient, or otherwise I wouldn't be loosing time. Is it so embedded
in the circuit that if it does malfunction, one discards the motherboard or
a large component?  Is this an unusual problem?

TIA

John Penasack

ATOM RSS1 RSS2