BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ron Yearns <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Feb 2014 20:20:05 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Again why is it we wish to move?  As some as said if it isn't broke leave it 
alone.
Ron

--------------------------------------------------
From: "KK4AHX Darren Duff" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:04 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?

> I vote for keeping this one. Don't see a problem with it.
>
>
>
> 73.
> Darren Duff.
> amateur radio station KK4AHX.
>
> Cherokee Amateur Radio Society.
> http://www.cherokeehams.com
>
> Cherokee County ARES.
> http://www.cherokee-ares.org
> When all else fails, Amateur Radio
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 7:59 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: New blind-hams list?
>
> Just wondering if anyone would be interested, opposed, predisposed, =
> whatever to a new home for this list, or a new list? I=92m not sure if =
> this list has a moderator or not, but one thing to doesn=92t have is a =
> sensible way of handling modern 8-bit plain text encoding. It isn=92t = 
> just
> me either, seems more people are using Macs and iThings to post = here, 
> thus
> more of the text that this listserv just does not grok. I=92ve = got the
> capability to host such a thing. Heck, I=92ll host it and = someone else 
> can
> moderate/administer/whatever it if the membership so = deems.=20= 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2