You wouldn't have to download the attachments if you were afraid of them.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?


> The attachment thing is not a problem, that's how all lists except those
> specifically for sharing files should be. Allowing attachments to an email
> list is just an invite for problems, in fact I'd leave the list if they
> allowed attachments.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:45 PM
> Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?
>
>
>>I didn't think we were talking about creating another completely different
>> list. ... Just a new list to replace this one.
>>
>> Am I interpreting things incorrectly here?
>>
>> Actually, I agree with Mark.
>>
>> As I have said so many times already, this list is a great list, and is 
>> by
>> far the best and most friendly list I have ever belonged to.
>>
>> I understand issues like the = 20 problem, the length limit for posts, 
>> and
>> the  inability to attach documents to posts.
>>
>> But, in my view, there may be ways around the problems.
>>
>> I am not at all opposed to change, but I also abide by the principle that
>> "If It ain't broke, don't try to fix it!".  (smile)
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>