BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:19:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (105 lines)
Hi Howard,
Well, you wouldn't believe this, I'm shocked as well, but we still have one, in my apartment building, right on the 1st floor! Who knows how long it will be their.
73,
Trippy, ac8s
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Howard, W A 9 Y B W 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 7:23 PM
  Subject: Re: Third party rules.


  Where do you find a "pay phone" these days???

  73

  Howard #3



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
  To: <[log in to unmask]>
  Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 4:09 PM
  Subject: Re: Third party rules.


  > I'm not sure I know anyone, except perhaps my 87 year old grandmother, and
  > my GF's 92 year old grandfather, that don't own a cell phone.
  > Why use auto patch when you can easily make a more or less private call to
  > who you want?
  > And, it's full duplex instead of half duplex like auto patch.
  > radio ops are used to keying up and talking and then listening to the 
  > other
  > persons transmission, but most people aren't, so having a meaningful
  > conversation over auto patch with a non-ham is almost impossible.
  > The only places radio telephone is still used that I know of is in remote
  > areas of north western, and northern canada where there is no cellular
  > coverage.  And with that, it's all commercial and operated by the regional
  > telco...we have one repeater here with auto patch, and it doesn't work 
  > most
  > of the time...it's more of a novelty than a reliable or useful feature.
  > Yes, I do pay for my cell phone air time, but I'm going to have that
  > regardless, so I might as well use the far more convenient and reliable 
  > cell
  > phone rather than a flaky or potentially unreliable autopatch.
  > And if my cell phone battery goes dead, well, I always keep enough change 
  > in
  > my wallet to use a pay phone if I have to for an emergency or something 
  > very
  > important.
  > I've also asked hams on the repeater to make a phone call for me when my
  > cell battery is dead, and I'm not near a pay phone, and I just happen to
  > have a handheld on me.
  > I pretty much always have a charged HT in my backpack when I'm travelling
  > around the city or out of town just in case.
  > I haven't heard phone patch on HF in probably 20 years either.
  >
  > 73
  > Colin, V A6BKX
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
  > To: <[log in to unmask]>
  > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 9:39 PM
  > Subject: Re: Third party rules.
  >
  >
  >> There's only one repeater I know of in my area with auto patch anymore 
  >> and
  >> each club member who chooses to, can pretty much only call home or
  >> whatever
  >> emergency  number they designate. Other than the amateur radio news line
  >> every week, I don't think that auto patch has been used for anything else
  >> in
  >> 7 or 8 years at the least, maybe more than 10.
  >> ----- Original Message ----- 
  >> From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
  >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
  >> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:44 PM
  >> Subject: Re: Third party rules.
  >>
  >>
  >>> There was a time when we had to do that too.  There was at least one
  >>> person
  >>> who was bringing up the autopatch without identifying himself and 
  >>> placing
  >>> calls to either long distance or 976 numbers.  I had to bring down the
  >>> patch
  >>> a few times myself when he did that, or tried to.  The club eventually
  >>> blocked most of these numbers as well as long distance numbers, and when
  >>> someone would try to do that, they would get a response in code, "SRI,"
  >>> which I believe is an abbreviation for sorry.
  >>> Harvey
  >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
  >>> From: "COLLEEN ROTH" <[log in to unmask]>
  >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
  >>> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 4:43 PM
  >>> Subject: Re: Third party rules.
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>>i have to say that there can be as many flaky people on the low bands as
  >>>>on
  >>>>UHFSTVHF.
  >>>> Not all poor operators are on UHFSTVHF.
  >>>> Colleen Roth, N8TNV;

ATOM RSS1 RSS2