Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:48:41 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<9DAED83414CE435E922609378E1EB4F1@longlife199547> |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Exactly. Well said. One thing to add, though - the purpose of exercise is to
prevent muscle degeneration, and stop muscle wasting along with regaining
lost muscle. Every pound regained requires up to 50 calories per day simply
to maintain itself. Since the average 70 year old has lost 30-35 pounds of
muscle, assuming regaining 30 lbs of muscle would result in 1500 calories
daily to maintain it. If someone's lost that much muscle, no doubt their
hormones are in a big mess, too.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paleolithic Eating Support List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jim Swayze
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Art DeVany's book: "The New Evolution Diet"
P.S. One other note to the group, everyone here needs to read Taubes'
article on exercise. Again, he's got it half right. But the half I
really like is that if you're exercising to lose weight, you are by
and large wasting your time. The purpose of exercise is to improve
functional capability and decidedly *not* to burn calories. Calories
will take care of themselves if you eat right, the best example being
a ketogenic paleo diet. Anyway, here's a link to the article: http://
nymag.com/news/sports/38001/
|
|
|