they should all be on the air.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?
> At least it's a bit easier to use than CQ Phone. That thing was impossible
> with all the graphics and when it's all said and done, noone really gets
> on
> it. Probably because they're on CQ 100 or echolink.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?
>
>
> I heard of it when it first started and when I asked them to put something
> on the site saying it was not really on the air, I was told a few things I
> could do with myself, none of which I can say on this list. Weather or not
> they ever did tell the truth on the site, I don't know, I'll never see the
> day I use something like that or go back to that site.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?
>
>
>> Well, John, I am sure you're not alone in your opinion. ... And, I
>> too
>> have reservations about it, which is probably the best reason I can think
>> of
>> as to why I never heard of or tried it.
>>
>> I just wanted to be sure I somehow wasn't missing something.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?
>>
>>
>> it's a fraudulent site, they claim you're on the air when in fact your
>> not
>> and it costs money if you can imagine that. Personally I think it's worse
>> than echolink and anyone using it should lose their licenses permanently
>> but
>> that's probably not going to happen.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:12 PM
>> Subject: Anyone ever heard of CQ100?
>>
>>
>>> Hi, all.
>>>
>>> The following thoughts are from a blind friend I have who isn't
>>> subscribed
>>> to the list, but who is an active ham nonetheless.
>>>
>>> He mentions something called CQ100.
>>>
>>> I've never heard of it, and wonder if anyone else has.
>>>
>>> Here's what he says about it:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>> I have got a place for the blind hams net.
>>> What about using cq100?
>>> You get all 5 hf bands, 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters. No qrm, and no
>>> sun
>>> spots to worry about.
>>> I worked all over north America and dx on 20, and 40, using it.
>>> You and everybody can find it at
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.qsonet.com
>>>
>>>
>>> 73 de WD8OEP
|
