they should all be on the air. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 12:00 AM Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100? > At least it's a bit easier to use than CQ Phone. That thing was impossible > with all the graphics and when it's all said and done, noone really gets > on > it. Probably because they're on CQ 100 or echolink. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:18 PM > Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100? > > > I heard of it when it first started and when I asked them to put something > on the site saying it was not really on the air, I was told a few things I > could do with myself, none of which I can say on this list. Weather or not > they ever did tell the truth on the site, I don't know, I'll never see the > day I use something like that or go back to that site. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]> > To: <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:09 PM > Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100? > > >> Well, John, I am sure you're not alone in your opinion. ... And, I >> too >> have reservations about it, which is probably the best reason I can think >> of >> as to why I never heard of or tried it. >> >> I just wanted to be sure I somehow wasn't missing something. >> >> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]> >> To: <[log in to unmask]> >> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:51 PM >> Subject: Re: Anyone ever heard of CQ100? >> >> >> it's a fraudulent site, they claim you're on the air when in fact your >> not >> and it costs money if you can imagine that. Personally I think it's worse >> than echolink and anyone using it should lose their licenses permanently >> but >> that's probably not going to happen. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]> >> To: <[log in to unmask]> >> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:12 PM >> Subject: Anyone ever heard of CQ100? >> >> >>> Hi, all. >>> >>> The following thoughts are from a blind friend I have who isn't >>> subscribed >>> to the list, but who is an active ham nonetheless. >>> >>> He mentions something called CQ100. >>> >>> I've never heard of it, and wonder if anyone else has. >>> >>> Here's what he says about it: >>> >>> >>> Hi Tom, >>> I have got a place for the blind hams net. >>> What about using cq100? >>> You get all 5 hf bands, 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 meters. No qrm, and no >>> sun >>> spots to worry about. >>> I worked all over north America and dx on 20, and 40, using it. >>> You and everybody can find it at >>> >>> >>> http://www.qsonet.com >>> >>> >>> 73 de WD8OEP