> don't understand why people have to demonize the people they disagree
with. I mean, some christian think other chr4istians >are wrong for
disagreeing with them.
>I have stopped...
Mag, I don't see Mike's non-sequitir...
I do see Ken's post as being possibly inflammatory:
>AND THEY COULD VERY MUCH JUST AS EASILY BE right
the problem I have with Ken's response, and I may be misinterpreting Mike's
original post, but IMHO, what Mike's getting at is a problem that many have,
whether they be atheists or fundamentalist (put your own label here) that
are unwilling to listen to another person's view point, because they are
convinced they are correct. It seems to me to be part and parcel of what
Obama was getting at when he said we should sit down with Iran and discuss
the situation odf nucleasr armaments with them, and he was told that
discussing things would be harmful....
I'm sure that Ken didn't mean to yell - Damn that CAPS LOCK key! ;-{)}
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Tamar Raine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I agree with Kat and Ken... I've had to bite my fingers to stay out of
> this. But I am completely behind Ken. Ken has raised issues that have
> nothing to do with religion. Then mike writes a non sequitor post which
> makes no sense at all, but hitting below the belt.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Tamar Mag Raine, Commissioner,
>
> Oakland Mayor's Commission on People with Disabilities
>
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.zazzle.com/TamarMag*
> www.cafepress.com/tamarmag
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Kathleen Salkin <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 5:22:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Why do people demonize others?
>
> Sorry - I guess I don't like the tone that this is taking - I think
> this is getting a bit personal.
>
> But if everyone disagrees with me, feel free to carry on.
>
> Kat
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Deri James <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > On Monday 25 May 2009 20:54:40 Kathleen Salkin wrote:
> >> OK can we stop here, please?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >>
> >> Kat
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Trisha Cummings <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi Mike,
> >>
> >
> > Hi Kat,
> >
> > You've got me a bit confused here!! (I admit its not difficult!!). You
> quoted
> > "Hi Mike" and asked us all to stop!!
> >
> > Given that I couldn't see anything at all objectionable in Trisha's post
> > please could you elucidate further what we are to stop.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Deri
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
> >
> > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
--
Kendall
An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's redundant!)
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress
depends on the unreasonable man.
-George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
