Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:10:43 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bob:
Right now, the antenna is 88 feet on the long end, and 44 feet on the short
end, to make a total of 132 feet.
My problem is that I was multiplying 132 times .66 for the long end, and
times .33 for the short end, which gave me the irronious figures to begin
with.
As Steve suggests, I should have multiplied 132 times .64 for the long end,
and 132 times .36 for the short end, to get the correct figures.
Last night for a while, we were playing around with various numbers, but
what I'm giving you here is the actual figures, and probably the figures
that should have been, had I done the calculations correctly to begin with.
Is that making more sense now?
73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob J." <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: Windom analysis and troubleshooting
> Tom,
>
> When I add your figures 84.48 + 44.88
> I get 129.36. I thought you wanted 132.
>
> When I subtract 84.48 from 132
> I get 47.52.
>
> Shouldn't the length of the long end plus the length of the short end
> equal the overall length?
>
> Multiply once and then subtract once. Seems less complex?
>
> Bob
>
|
|
|