Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2009 13:58:17 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:30:24 -0600, Geoffrey Purcell
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I agree it's just 1 study, albeit a review of other studies, so it could
> easily be flawed in and of itself. That's the trouble, given false
> parameters/premises etc. , anyone can create a study with almost any
> wished-for result.
Actually, some of us have a larger battle on our hands, than whether
cooked meat
or raw meat is healthier/deadlier. There is a HUGE amount of propaganda
out there that
eating meat in any form is a high risk factor for cancer, especially
breast cancer. This test, with over 120,000 subjects, may help people who
are confused or on the fence on
the subject. Thanks, Kathryn.
Lynnet
|
|
|