On Fri, 29 May 2009 13:30:24 -0600, Geoffrey Purcell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I agree it's just 1 study, albeit a review of other studies, so it could > easily be flawed in and of itself. That's the trouble, given false > parameters/premises etc. , anyone can create a study with almost any > wished-for result. Actually, some of us have a larger battle on our hands, than whether cooked meat or raw meat is healthier/deadlier. There is a HUGE amount of propaganda out there that eating meat in any form is a high risk factor for cancer, especially breast cancer. This test, with over 120,000 subjects, may help people who are confused or on the fence on the subject. Thanks, Kathryn. Lynnet