C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cerebral Palsy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:35:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
actually linda is right on the fact that i do not post
much of controversy direct to the list as much as i
once did. i am following the advice that i give my son
"choose your fights well and be sure they are worth
the efford you are going to have to put in them." i
post many things to about 3 or 4 people who for the
most part do not agreee with my opinions, but that i 
know are not going to attack me for having my
opinions. 
  the last time i posted on an issue like this one, it
was entwined in with a discussion of not only polygamy
but gay rights and other alternative lifestyles. when
i said "many adults wanted sex with children" i was
accused of "hate speech." after that post i got quite
a load of off list email(from the tolerate liberals on
the list) and if you want to know hate speech you
should have been able to read a few of those. that
lead me to post my "i will not be intimidated" by this
tactic email. 
  now, since the subject is out here, these people are
Pedophiles. they are like a nest of vermin. you attack
them in one place and they just move to another and
produce anotherr nest. 
   linda's opinion that officials at the mormon church
publicly  critisize polygamay while giving it a wink
and a nod my  indeed be true. i can neither confirm
nor disprove it. i know that the mormons that i
personally know do not like it.  the law enforcement
and  politicos from arizona and utah might could have
given texas a "heads up" if they knew these people
were in texas. every state has their own law
enforcement.
   like i said these are Pedophiles. this bunch hides
behind "religion." 
   when you talk of pedophiles though, you have to go
after them all. you also talk of the judges who turn
these convicted beast loose back on the streets (and
back on our kids) with little or no years in jail. you
talk of the states where a few politicos block passage
of some version of jessica's law in their state. off
the top of my head i think off Mass. WHERE ONE
DEMOCRAT POLITICIAN HAS BLOCK A VOTE IN THE
LEGISLATURE FOR 2 YEARS.  
you can't just get after the dirty old men who want
young girls, you have to think of older women who want
young boys. i think of one in forida who was "too
pretty to go to jail." 
there are men who want young boys and women who want
young girls. they are all pedophiles. 
  now i will reap the opinion that got so much heat.
when you start redefining marriage as something
different that one woman married to one man to
accommodate one alternate lifestyle, you are going to
have another group go before some pinhead judge and
asking "ratify me too." where does it stop once you
are on the slippery slope? 
  if you think this is hate speech and want to email
me; DON'T BOTHER.      



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.  
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2