Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:42:58 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Feb 5, 2007, at 1:01 PM, C. Kuni wrote:
> A friend of mine is switching from Canola oil to Rice Bran oil and
> wants to recommend it. I am skeptical. These are the websites she
> cited:
> http://www.californiariceoil.com/nutrition.htm
> http://www.ricebranoil.info/index.html
> Any thoughts? Has anyone looked into it?
> Thanks,
> Cynthia
I'm curious how one could consider this Paleo, first of all. Rice
isn't Paleo, didn't exist as we know it until man cultivated it, and
cannot reproduce itself without intervention. Add to that a
technology to get the bran off the rice and then extract oil, and I
think we're pushing it a bit here. I am not convinced vegetable oils
play a seminal role in our nutrition, nor are they without a downside
in most cases, due to the plant compounds being hard to metabolize
and sometimes toxic.
I suppose it might be a clue to note that one of the websites says it
is "refined, bleached, dewaxed, and deodorized", not to mention the
"high fry life" claimed. This is not food, for me.
ginny
All stunts performed without a net!
|
|
|