BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:08:23 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (75 lines)
That is the same with the Win-96 you have to play around with it, and I
don't know how well it works with JFW 8.0





On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Russ Kiehne wrote:

> In my case, the pro96 cost a lot more then I needed to pay.  Here in the San
> Francisco bay area, only one agency is using digital.  With the pro97, I can
> hear everything I want to hear.  It was only $150.00.  I bought some nnimh
> batteries for it.  I now do a lot of listening.
> I take it, you are talking about win96 by Starsoft.  I've used win97 and
> parts of it are not useable.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.
>
>
> > Hi Anthony and the group.  I am back on the list after being away from
> > mail for a week, but if you are considering the 96 it is very user
> > friendly for someone who is blind.  I haven't checked out the software
> > with JAWS 8, but I will try and do that later on this week.  More later.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Anthony Vece wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe I'll get one.
> >>
> >> But, it will have to be well after Christmas.
> >>
> >> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Kenneth Lee" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 1:58 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.
> >>
> >>
> >> > Yes, the PRO-97 is a later model. -Ken
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: For blind ham radio operators
> >> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> >> > On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne
> >> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 12:56 PM
> >> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >> > Subject: Re: RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I don't know.
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 9:28 AM
> >> > Subject: Re: RS PRO-96 scanner was RE: New to the list.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> So then the PRO 97 is a later model?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2