Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 3 May 2009 11:21:34 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I wondered about that.
Pat Barrett
----- Original Message -----
From: "william" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Cordain
> Kenneth Anderson wrote:
>
>>
>> You seem to have found a diet that works for you and your specific
>> situation. Should all other diets, even the researched diets, be
>> rejected? I think Cordain makes a general definition of how Paleo
>> people lived and eat, he doesn't seem to center on any one region or
>> people.
>>
>
> I tried other diets, including Cordain's, which is BTW Neolithic. His is
> better than SAD, but that does not make it paleolithic.
>
> He ignores the evidence that those who try what we believe is a true
> paleodiet succeed in regaining health, while others fail.
> He ignores the studies in "Good Calories Bad Calories" which show that low
> fat is nonsense.
>
> A scientist who ignores evidence is not respectable, and I cannot trust
> him.
>
> William
|
|
|