I've never bullied you in any way, shape, or form, I simply asked one time
because there are many that say you don't have one but since you got so
offended when I asked you once, you've just proven me right in a lot of
people's eyes. I will never deal with you on anything at this point nor will
I be paying attention to any more messages from you so this is now closed,
you gave the proof.
----- Original Message -----
From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
> first, there is no evidence what so ever, and second, I refuse to give my
> callsign to people who continuously bully and victimise for it. I would
> also
> remind you, that I am under no legal obligation to give it to anyone when
> not on air.
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 2:19 AM
> Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
>
>
>> what's your call sign? there is good evidence that suggests you don't
>> have
>> one.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
>>
>>
>> > and why should I not buy ham radio transmitters, when I have a licence
>> > already?
>> > also, why should I take the test twice just to please you?
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----=20
>> > From: "Georgina Joyce" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:48 PM
>> > Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
>> >
>> >
>> >> Hi Simon
>> >>
>> >> I'm sorry, but you keep asking difficult questions of the radio
> communi=
>> > ty.
>> > Many of us will NOT assist you in breaking the law. You keep buying
> amat=
>> > eur
>> > transmitters and now your asking for a CB antenna, which I understand
>> > to
> =
>> > be
>> > an ilegal CB UK band. Or is this yiki wrong?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Many CB users who witnessed the noisy and unruly conditions on 27
> MH=
>> > z
>> > wanted to get away from all that and use
>> >> the superior 934 MHz UHF CB allocation. In fact, the cost of
>> >> cutting
>> > edge (at the time) UHF radio equipment
>> >> meant that only the more serious CB operator would use the band, a
> n=
>> > ice
>> > though expensive haven for mature CB
>> >> operators, and radio hams who didn't like the 'red tape' of amateur
>> > radio. At first the range was limited, but
>> >> as antenna restrictions were lifted and better equipment started to
>> > appear, the number of UHF CB operators
>> >> grew. The 934 MHz band was eventually discontinued by the
> government=
>> > on
>> > [23]31 December [24]1998 due to low
>> >> user numbers. The main reason for the public refusing to accept the
> =
>> > 934
>> > MHz band was its cost (up to =A3500 for
>> >> a radio), coupled with the fact that by the time reliable Japanese
>> > equipment became available in the
>> >> mid-1980s, most people had opted for the noisy and cheap 27 MHz, or
>> > gone on to take the Radio Amateur Exam.
>> >>
>> >> I suggest that you undertake the amateur exams and you'll develope the
>> > skills to build your own antennas legal or ilegal but don't ask us to
>> > do
> =
>> > it
>> > for you.
>> >>
>> >> Gena
>> >> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:20:10AM +0100, goshawk wrote:
>> >> > hello list,=3D20
>> >> > I am looking for a good 934MHZ aerial, for both transmit and receive
> =
>> > =3D
>> >> > please. I would prefer a vertical rather than a beam.=3D20
>> >> > if anyone has one to clear out, or knows where there are any going,
> =3D
>> >> > please email off list to,=3D20
>> >> > [log in to unmask]
>> >> >
>> >> > Simon=3D20
>> >> >
>> >> ---end quoted text---
>> >>
>> >> --=20
>> >> 2E0AXU
>> >>
>> >> Freedom & Power provided by debian GNU Linux
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
|
