BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:19:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
what's your call sign? there is good evidence that suggests you don't have 
one.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "goshawk" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.


> and why should I not buy ham radio transmitters, when I have a licence
> already?
> also, why should I take the test twice just to please you?
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Georgina Joyce" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:48 PM
> Subject: Re: looking for a 934 aerial please.
>
>
>> Hi Simon
>>
>> I'm sorry, but you keep asking difficult questions of the radio communi=
> ty.
> Many of us will NOT assist you in breaking the law.  You keep buying amat=
> eur
> transmitters and now your asking for a CB antenna, which I understand to =
> be
> an ilegal CB UK band.  Or is this yiki wrong?
>>
>>
>>    Many CB users who witnessed the noisy and unruly conditions on 27 MH=
> z
> wanted to get away from all that and use
>>    the superior 934 MHz UHF CB allocation. In fact, the cost of cutting
> edge (at the time) UHF radio equipment
>>    meant that only the more serious CB operator would use the band, a n=
> ice
> though expensive haven for mature CB
>>    operators, and radio hams who didn't like the 'red tape' of amateur
> radio. At first the range was limited, but
>>    as antenna restrictions were lifted and better equipment started to
> appear, the number of UHF CB operators
>>    grew. The 934 MHz band was eventually discontinued by the government=
> on
> [23]31 December [24]1998 due to low
>>    user numbers. The main reason for the public refusing to accept the =
> 934
> MHz band was its cost (up to =A3500 for
>>    a radio), coupled with the fact that by the time reliable Japanese
> equipment became available in the
>>    mid-1980s, most people had opted for the noisy and cheap 27 MHz, or
> gone on to take the Radio Amateur Exam.
>>
>> I suggest that you undertake the amateur exams and you'll develope the
> skills to build your own antennas legal or ilegal but don't ask us to do =
> it
> for you.
>>
>> Gena
>> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:20:10AM +0100, goshawk wrote:
>> > hello list,=3D20
>> > I am looking for a good 934MHZ aerial, for both transmit and receive =
> =3D
>> > please. I would prefer a vertical rather than a beam.=3D20
>> > if anyone has one to clear out, or knows where there are any going, =3D
>> > please email off list to,=3D20
>> > [log in to unmask]
>> >
>> > Simon=3D20
>> >
>> ---end quoted text---
>>
>> --=20
>> 2E0AXU
>>
>> Freedom & Power provided by debian GNU Linux
>>
>>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2